Wood ID

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

dapperistdan

New Member
Aug 5, 2014
37
MA
I've got a source of wood from a friend. I'm pretty sure its maple, but i'm not sure what type (silver, sugar, red). Is there anyway to tell from the grain/bark? I dont have a leaf to show. the trees were cut in january and i saw sap coming from the stumps today, i'm not sure if that means anything.

[Hearth.com] Wood ID


[Hearth.com] Wood ID


[Hearth.com] Wood ID


[Hearth.com] Wood ID


sorry pics arent oriented right, too lazy to rotate and re-upload

what do you think?
 
White ash , distinctive dark dot at center ,similar to Norway maple , but def ash
 
Not familiar with it but put me down for Norway; Wood doesn't look like the White Ash I see here. Split one; I think that would seal it. Ash would have a more grainy split surface, Maple would be pretty smooth:
[Hearth.com] Wood ID [Hearth.com] Wood ID
 
Norway Maple
 
Yep, split sure looks like Maple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: claydogg84
My experience with Norway is that it is pretty mediocre. Norways are ornamental maples that were planted because they grow pretty quickly. We have a ton in the 'burbs where I live. We cut down two on our little lot and I still have three more out back.
I found that even CSS it needed almost two years. 7 or 8 months just isn't enough. Once it is seasoned, it burns up pretty quickly. Not a bad wood to mix in with some good stuff, but I wouldn't want to burn it exclusively.
 
I think its a grade above mediocre. Norway is denser than Red maple and the hardness is close to sugar maple. My house is completely surrounded by them. I can see where DEC would list them as invasive because their helicopter seeds have a very high germination percentage. I have baby seedlings all over the lawn every spring.
One thing though, Norway has really thin bark and the wood posted has thick inner bark. Im gonna say no on it being Norway. And I dont mind being wrong.
 
I have 2 yard trees. One is a sugar maple and the other is a Norway maple. Both were planted at the same time and about the same size. I am not a fertilizer freak so my trees must make use of what they can find. After .37 years they are about the same size, around 16 inches dbh, so my bet is each would provide about equal BTUs per cord. If I was one of those 3 times a year fertilizer guys both would be double their present diameter if they were still standing. Mine sail right through the ice storms and high winds and I help my neighbors that fertilize heavily remove all the broken stuff after any severe storm. Their trees are larger at dbh but do not have the nice balanced look of mine because they have lost so much over the years. Don't confuse the inherent quality of a tree with how poor it becomes when over fertilized.
I have to agree with applesister, the bark on my Norway has split open more than once over the years because it is so thin and is susceptible to freeze damage. It also heals well but leaves behind the tell-tale marks.
 
Last edited:
I think you have a couple different types actually, and Norway looks like its in there, but several of the pics are not Norway maple.
All those shots are not from the same tree.
 
I think you have a couple different types
That's what I thought at first, but could be the bark is different on smaller limbs that are farther up the tree...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.