Maybe. It's wet here but if they're covered, the wind would likely help. I've thrown it in the garage, figuring it gets some warmth from the house. I've also been bringing a few pieces in the house and setting them at the foot of the stove.

BKVP, OUR SINCERE COMPLIMENTS.
When we arrive at this house typically on a Friday night and the house is cold. We keep the heat on 50'F when we aren't here. We need big heat when we get here and we need it pretty much now.
We fire up the Princess and within an hour, the fire in the stove is established, the house warming up nicely, and we're sitting down to dinner.
We are in shoulder season, we need heat but we don't need big heat.
Once this Princess is established, we can do just about anything we want with that thermostat. The stove responds pretty much immediately. We can turn the thermostat to low, and the stove burns on low it doesn't go out, it actually burns on low. We can turn the thermostat up and it responds. I turned it up this evening to cook dinner on the stove top (that works well too!) and then we turned it right back down. And down it went- but it didn't go out. Right now she's humming along at setting 1. Setting 1. Still lit, still burning, CAT active, but not running us out of here. I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen it myself.
This is an AWESOME stove!![]()
![]()

)This is an AWESOME stove!![]()
![]()
I can't run full bore..noway!
i have a strong draft. When the stove is ready for cruise I can usually run on 1 all the time and I know for a fact the t sat on mine is closed at 1 and will not open even if the stove goes tob stone cold..well maybe just a crack at that point.Ditto. Although mine probably don't pour the air in like yours.
Yes..more surface area per pound.Here is a question for everyone, how does log size affect burn time on low settings? Lets assume same weight of wood for both loads, one load is small splits, the next load is several much larger pieces. If using the same thermostat setting how will burn time be affected? Am I right in assuming that even though its thermostatically controlled, the small wood will be consumed faster?
I don't think this is the main determinant. I imagine the rate of burn is limited by the rate at which air (oxygen) can be sucked into the stove, which in turn is determined by both the opening angle of the air valve and by the velocity of air through the opening, the latter probably defined mainly by the strength of the draft. Theoretically. In real life, the smaller splits are probably going to be drier, so cat stall will be less likely. But then there's the wonderful thermostat, which should even out some of these effects. So I'm going to say that I think split size will have very little effect on low burns, assuming optimally-dry wood.Yes..more surface area per pound.
lolI don't think this is the main determinant. I imagine the rate of burn is limited by the rate at which air (oxygen) can be sucked into the stove, which in turn is determined by both the opening angle of the air valve and by the velocity of air through the opening, the latter probably defined mainly by the strength of the draft. Theoretically. In real life, the smaller splits are probably going to be drier, so cat stall will be less likely. But then there's the wonderful thermostat, which should even out some of these effects. So I'm going to say that I think split size will have very little effect on low burns, assuming optimally-dry wood.
I don't think this is the main determinant. I imagine the rate of burn is limited by the rate at which air (oxygen) can be sucked into the stove, which in turn is determined by both the opening angle of the air valve and by the velocity of air through the opening, the latter probably defined mainly by the strength of the draft. Theoretically. In real life, the smaller splits are probably going to be drier, so cat stall will be less likely. But then there's the wonderful thermostat, which should even out some of these effects. So I'm going to say that I think split size will have very little effect on low burns, assuming optimally-dry wood.
Yeah, if you discount the whole argument about amount of air, and just assume a given thermostat setting (in a given installation) is going to keep the stove at a certain temperature, well then, again, split size should make no difference, because a given stove temperature corresponds to a given btu/hour heat output (again, for a given installation).so the same amount of wood will last the same time. But again, I think those large splits are more likely to give cat stall - because of the smaller surface area, they might not outgas enough to keep the draft going.... just feed the thing and let the tstat handle it.

Yeah, if you discount the whole argument about amount of air, and just assume a given thermostat setting (in a given installation) is going to keep the stove at a certain temperature, well then, again, split size should make no difference, because a given stove temperature corresponds to a given btu/hour heat output (again, for a given installation).so the same amount of wood will last the same time. But again, I think those large splits are more likely to give cat stall - because of the smaller surface area, they might not outgas enough to keep the draft going.
But hey, do the experiment and let us know. (If you're not afraid the wife will have you carted away to the "nervous hospital" if she sees you weighing the wood before you load the stove![]()
Eh, I might get chewed out, but have been chewed out before. I only really get in trouble if I get caught with cylinder heads or intake manifolds in the dishwasher.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.