2016-17 Blaze King Performance Thread (Everything BK) Part 2

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if a stove (let's use a 6" BK for example) would run the same with a 6" liner all the way to the top, and with a larger liner with a 6" reducer at one or both ends. My kneejerk reaction is that the larger liner with the reducer will draft more, but fluid dynamics is super complicated and I don't really know how it would actually pan out.
I have a 6" class A and an 8" class A, I've ran most all of my stoves on both flues. The 8" flue offered better results in my experience with all my stoves. Both are only a total of 15' or so.
 
We have done it when the manufacturer says it is ok. But with his short chimney and a blaze king which is pretty sensitive to low draft I would not try it without getting the ok myself.
Agreed. Minimum height flue and an oval liner with a BK, better safe than sorry..
 
  • Like
Reactions: bholler
I have a 6" class A and an 8" class A, I've ran most all of my stoves on both flues. The 8" flue offered better results in my experience with all my stoves. Both are only a total of 15' or so.
So much for chimney science. ;lol
 
The 8" flue offered better results in my experience with all my stoves.
We have had customers who had quite a few problems running 6" stoves in 8" chimneys and 8" stoves in 6" chimneys. But then there are others like you where things work just fine on the wrong size flue.
 
So much for chimney science. ;lol
Yeah we see stuff all the time that should not work at all but does and then you have one occasionally where everything seems right but it just wont work right. Chimney physics is extreme complicated and there are to many variable for it to make sense all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: webby3650
We have had customers who had quite a few problems running 6" stoves in 8" chimneys and 8" stoves in 6" chimneys. But then there are others like you where things work just fine on the wrong size flue.

That's not just a mystery of fluid dynamics, though.

Imagine the stove puffs smoke into the house when the door opens... One user says, 'Well, I'm going to turn up the air before I open the door next time, then I will check the cap and sweep the flue, and then I will try increasing my stack height a little'.

The next user says, 'MAH NEW STOVE DONE BROKE ALREADY'. :)

(Like the mysteries of fluid dynamics, the mysteries of why the hell people do the stuff they do remain fairly opaque to me.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsucet
On a whole new topic, check out this banner ad I found on an internet forum somewhere!

Blaze_King_Banner_3.jpg
 
Wow, you're about over the hill! C'mon out here, we'll get you trimmed down; I've got a lot of wood to get out before the brush grows in.
Thats the the problem Woody; these BK's burn so efficiantly and with such long burn times compared to other stoves (even other cat stoves) that I dont need to be in the woods shucking wood all the time, actually this season is looking like a 2.5 cord season for me and I started burning in the beginning of November. The first season I had my BK (14/15) was on of the longest / coldest unrelenting winters we had in 15 years and i only burnt 5 cords, the year before that one i had a US 2500 stove and burnt about 6.5 cords and that winter wasnt nearly as long as the next.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woody Stover
I have a 6" class A and an 8" class A, I've ran most all of my stoves on both flues. The 8" flue offered better results in my experience with all my stoves. Both are only a total of 15' or so.

Can you clarify "better results"? I have both a 6" insulated chimney and what I think is an 8x8 clay lined chimney with a rather long connector. The 6" drafts harder when hot, but back drafts when cold because it's an outside chimney and the stove is in the basement. The 8" is interior and the stove is on the first floor. It drafts even when the stove isn't burning, and works a lot better because it drafts more consistently, not because it's got a stronger draft.
 
Can you clarify "better results"? I have both a 6" insulated chimney and what I think is an 8x8 clay lined chimney with a rather long connector. The 6" drafts harder when hot, but back drafts when cold because it's an outside chimney and the stove is in the basement. The 8" is interior and the stove is on the first floor. It drafts even when the stove isn't burning, and works a lot better because it drafts more consistently, not because it's got a stronger draft.
That sounds pretty normal for the basement flue, that's just 1 of the issues of having a stove in the basement.

Stoves on my 6" flue have always had a tendency to smoke when I open the door. When I've moved these stoves to my 8" flue they don't. I have never seen any negative results with running a 6" stove on an 8" flue in my house. Both flue are just under 15'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tpenny67
It was still warm outdoors when I went to bed last night, and probably just dropped momentarily below 60F in the early morning hours. It's headed to 75F today... in February! The Ashfords are going cold, today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drstorm
I'm reading thru several posts here, from folks who should know better than to say a BK is particularly draft sensitive. If run at the same rate as any other stove, there's no reason a BK is going to require a better chimney than any other stove. The design is straight up and out, with a very large cat cross section, the perfect recipe for easy breathing.

It is ONLY when you try running that BK down low, where no other stove on earth can run, that it demands a better chimney.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerBob
It's headed to 75F today... in February!
Same here...but not for long. Fire in the hole! :ZZZ
Capture.JPG
If run at the same rate as any other stove, there's no reason a BK is going to require a better chimney than any other stove. The design is straight up and out, with a very large cat cross section, the perfect recipe for easy breathing.
It is ONLY when you try running that BK down low, where no other stove on earth can run, that it demands a better chimney.
Yep, there's a point at which a low burn not going to create enough heat to keep the chimney working, which is when they have to start adding height, need a straighter chimney, or whatever.
There are a few in the "Ashford--smoke smell" thread that said they don't run below 2 o'clock, but I don't think they said how long it burns at that air setting. Is your 24-hr. stove on the tall chimney or the short one? What is your air setting?
Looks like I'll be a fat 40 year old lol.
What 'til you get to my age; With a piIe of sawdust, I've got enough extra fat on me to make a lifetime supply of fire-starters. ;lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blazing
My smoke smell went away when I shoved 6" A down the 8" Metalbestos solid pack. Now it is 6" from stove to cap, 17' total height and double walled telescoping in the house of~6'. The moral of the chimney story is "Try it for 30 days , then inspect the chimney" Credit to BKVP.
 
BKs are not demanding in chimney requirements. That being said, a proper chimney will support the exceptionally low burn rate that an air tuber just can't provide. Air tubers (secondary burn) stoves have their place though. As I drive around and see chimneys that are belching dark blue smoke every time we pass by, I will remark to my wife: those people need a blaze king. Way too many people run their air tube stoves below secondary burn rate and fill whole regions with stinky smoke.
 
We see that a lot in the country around here too. Many folks still burn poorly seasoned wood in old smoke dragons. Note there are tube stoves that match cat emissions performance including the inexpensive Englander 30NC.
 
Even at the very low BK burn rates? Hard to believe but, I guess, not impossible.

Wet wood will always be problematic.
 
We see that a lot in the country around here too. Many folks still burn poorly seasoned wood in old smoke dragons. Note there are tube stoves that match cat emissions performance including the inexpensive Englander 30NC.
Clean burning yes, but not slow by any means.
If you pump enough heat up the flue your bound to have Clean emissions. ;lol
 
Somehow we continue to bumble through mild weather heating with a moderate temperatured (and clean) flue. No drama, no big temp swings. Above 50F the heat pump kicks in as the less expensive and much cleaner option. Flue temp at that point is ambient. >>
 
It is ONLY when you try running that BK down low, where no other stove on earth can run, that it demands a better chimney.
Yes but why would you buy a bk if you don't ever plan on doing that?
 
Yes but why would you buy a bk if you don't ever plan on doing that?
So I can have nearly constant heat output and longer burns. Even on high my BKs have had longer burn times than any of my similar sized non-cats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Highbeam
Well, I am burning at low, low right now. The flue is 200F stove top 175F. Four hours from now it will get stuffed full of pine again and that will take me to this time again tomorrow. Dream stove.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.