Last edited by a moderator:
The 4wheelers them selves are cheaper when buying used. The parts thing, a lot of people dont know that a lot of Suzuki parts will work. When buying arctic cat brand parts, I find them more expensive. I had a 400 arctic cat and the magnets came loose on the flywheel. Once I figured out what suzuki was the same the flywheel was almost $200 cheaper for the suzuki part vs arctic cat. Same part too.Cats more expensive? I didn’t think so! FYI older Cats using the 250,300,400 oil cooled, and 500 liquid cooled use Suzuki motors. Engine related parts can be sourced at Suzuki dealers for around 30% less than at Cat dealers. In order of equivalents they are the Ozark, king quad LY for 300 is 2002, Eiger and Vinson.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Arctic cat also had a 650v2 which used a Kawasaki 650 v-twin. I know my 4wheers. I have been around and worked on them for over 20yrs.Cats more expensive? I didn’t think so! FYI older Cats using the 250,300,400 oil cooled, and 500 liquid cooled use Suzuki motors. Engine related parts can be sourced at Suzuki dealers for around 30% less than at Cat dealers. In order of equivalents they are the Ozark, king quad LY for 300 is 2002, Eiger and Vinson.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Arctic cat also had a 650v2 which used a Kawasaki 650 v-twin. I know my 4wheers. I have been around and worked on them for over 20yrs.
The 4wheelers them selves are cheaper when buying used. The parts thing, a lot of people dont know that a lot of Suzuki parts will work. When buying arctic cat brand parts, I find them more expensive. I had a 400 arctic cat and the magnets came loose on the flywheel. Once I figured out what suzuki was the same the flywheel was almost $200 cheaper for the suzuki part vs arctic cat. Same part too.
I can remember when I got my Rubicon 500, the dealer told me if it would mostly be a working ATV to get that model since it had a straight rear axle and that it would be better for working. I’m glad I listened to him since I hardly ever put my ATV on the trails to ride and like you say a tough one at that for the most part.If I was choosing between the three it would be an easy choice . . . the Rubicon. Newer, more CCs and being that it's for work you pretty much cannot go wrong with a Honda. Hondas are often more expensive and their "tech" lags behind many of the other brands (i.e. many models still use disc brakes), but they are, as a rule, pretty tough. Second choice would be the older Yamaha.
I think you mean the Rincon above, the Rubicon like I have is more of a working ATV. The Rincon is a trail machine. It has 3 speeds as opposed to the Rubicons 5 and it has an independent rear suspension where the Rubicon has a straight rear axle that’s better for work but not so good on the trail.I don't have any real advice on what to choose since I have only been experienced with my used 2011 Polaris Ranger. I have been in a new Japanese diesel side by side that someone unbelievably paid 30 something for that I wouldn't trade my Ranger for straight across if you don't consider the money value. I paid 5k for my Ranger used 4 to 5 years ago and couldn't be happier other than I wish it had power steering. Look for a deal used would be my advice and a 2011 Ranger 500 would be on my short list.
The older Rubicon has the 3 speed like the rincon has. They did a complete make over on the rubicon.I think you mean the Rincon above, the Rubicon like I have is more of a working ATV. The Rincon is a trail machine. It has 3 speeds as opposed to the Rubicons 5 and it has an independent rear suspension where the Rubicon has a straight rear axle that’s better for work but not so good on the trail.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.