firebroad said:Might be better to make sure wood sellers don't sell wet wood. Especially when they advertise it as "seasoned".
Ja, forget about personal responsibility on the homeowner/woodburners part.joecool85 said:firebroad said:Might be better to make sure wood sellers don't sell wet wood. Especially when they advertise it as "seasoned".
That's true. There should be a legal limit for moisture content and calling it "seasoned".
inevitabLEE said:Ja, forget about personal responsibility on the homeowners part.joecool85 said:firebroad said:Might be better to make sure wood sellers don't sell wet wood. Especially when they advertise it as "seasoned".
That's true. There should be a legal limit for moisture content and calling it "seasoned".
I witnessed first hand how the government (USDA) handled the EAB and it was/is a joke.
If I had to season all the wood I sell for 2+ years I'd charge $600 cord. It wood take 3 times the handling I do now and 20 acres of ground.
What's next ,,,,,, regulated well done sushi!!
A water burner?MishMouse said:Or a better suggestion would be to design a stove that burns > 90% efficiency with less then seasoned wood.
.
inevitabLEE said:..regulated well done sushi!!
inevitabLEE said:Ja, forget about personal responsibility on the homeowner/woodburners part.joecool85 said:firebroad said:Might be better to make sure wood sellers don't sell wet wood. Especially when they advertise it as "seasoned".
That's true. There should be a legal limit for moisture content and calling it "seasoned".
I witnessed first hand how the government (USDA) handled the EAB and it was/is a joke.
If I had to season all the wood I sell for 2+ years I'd charge $600 cord. It wood take 3 times the handling I do now and 20 acres of ground.
What's next ,,,,,, regulated well done sushi!!
No stove burns > 90% efficiency with even dry wood. Take out the "burns > 90% efficiency" requirement and you have an OWB. Those OWB guys claim they are designed to burn green wood. Heck they even have one called Greenwood.MishMouse said:Or a better suggestion would be to design a stove that burns > 90% efficiency with less then seasoned wood..
Then you probably wouldn't like the German solution either. Last I heard they test your boiler/stove for emissions with a drop down probe in the chimney. If it doesn't pass you are given a chance to correct it. When they come back if it doesn't pass the heating appliance goes with them. RandyMishMouse said:Or a better suggestion would be to design a stove that burns > 90% efficiency with less then seasoned wood.
Saying a ban on unseasoned wood would give the EPA the authority to come into your home and fine you if the moisture meter does not read what they want it to read.
MishMouse said:Or a better suggestion would be to design a stove that burns > 90% efficiency with less then seasoned wood.
Saying a ban on unseasoned wood would give the EPA the authority to come into your home and fine you if the moisture meter does not read what they want it to read.
CTYank said:MishMouse said:Or a better suggestion would be to design a stove that burns > 90% efficiency with less then seasoned wood.
Saying a ban on unseasoned wood would give the EPA the authority to come into your home and fine you if the moisture meter does not read what they want it to read.
Wee bit paranoid?
Want EPA into designing stoves now? Or just pushing the impractical?
Define "seasoned" precisely, please.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.