raybonz, that's a nice looking wood shed. Is there any way to enlarge the picture so I can get a better look?I get easy 8 hr. burns with the T-5 and can get 10+ hrs. on a full load. The Super 27 should be able to do this as well...
Ray
raybonz, that's a nice looking wood shed. Is there any way to enlarge the picture so I can get a better look?I get easy 8 hr. burns with the T-5 and can get 10+ hrs. on a full load. The Super 27 should be able to do this as well...
Ray
Thanx Mitch! Have pics here: https://www.hearth.com/talk/threads/getting-ready-for-winter.75747/#post-959610 . Also more pics in the forum somewhere..raybonz, that's a nice looking wood shed. Is there any way to enlarge the picture so I can get a better look?
Pokers kill baffles. Fires don't kill baffles.
Pokers kill baffles. Fires don't kill baffles.
Wondering why you burn so much wood I thought it would be much more moderate than that in California..
Ray
For the next few years, all I have is alder and a little fir, so I'm not going to count on lengthy burns here anyway.
Interesting perspective. I was just going by BTU/cord figures, but I suppose other variables are important as well for burn time. In fact, I actually like alder because it's plentiful here, easy to cut and split and drys quickly. I may never have to push this PE for heat output anyway in this climate and houseYou may not know this yet but the red alder will be the best wood for long burns. People like doug fir but it doesn't produce enough ash to shade the coals from air. The alder does make enough ash so burn times are longer.
House size, insulation, location does not matter when you are shooting for max burn time. The tradeoff for longer burn times is less heat per hour. If you try to maximize burn times you will do this by minimizing heat output so you must first have sufficient heat before you even care about burn time.
In the non-cat world, burn times are limited by pollution requirements. You will pretty much find that larger stoves burn longer. You will also find that heat output is almost out of your control, other than fuel load, so you must size your non-cat to the house. It's a tough deal, really no reason that anybody should be using a stove smaller than 2 real CF for heating.

What is the longest non-cat burning stove on the market today that you can buy?? I currently own a Wonderwood circulator wood stove which does not do bad, but I am only getting around 4-5 hours of burn time. I would like to find a wood stove that can get somewhere around 7-8 hours at least so I don't have to get up every morning around 2-3AM to put more wood on the fire to keep it going. I know the cat stoves will burn much longer, but I don't want to worry about the maintenance and I have heard the cat stoves can have issues with creosote building up. Any input is much appreciated!
Wondering why you burn so much wood I thought it would be much more moderate than that in California..
Ray
While he is in a "moderate" part of Cali, you, like most, don't really realize how perfect California is. EVERY climate is available there. My dad has property outside Truckee, and when I was a youngster, it's where we lived year 'round. I have seen 20 FEET of snow on the ground, and that ain't a drift. Seen it snow a foot on the 4th of July...
When I was in middle school we moved to the central valley, and life was good.. Year 'round, an hour to hour and half east.. snow to play in and ski, same distance west, the ocean to play in and surf. Year 'round.
Thanks but, any property thats "yours" is nice - anywhere in this country. I've seen some outstanding spreads from the other experts on this site and often feel humbled.Cool looks like a nice property you have there!
Ray
I hear ya on that! It's quite nice in my location as wellThanks but, any property thats "yours" is nice - anywhere in this country. I've seen some outstanding spreads from the other experts on this site and often feel humbled.

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.