My first Outdoor Hydronic Furnace build....OHF

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.

all night moe

Minister of Fire
Hearth Supporter
Nov 19, 2015
1,859
earth
Warning: This is a lengthy read. Some of you know I can write lengthy posts. LOL.

I have acquired some parts and have a plan. This is my first version enabling myself an outdoor unit and investing in the initial plumbing, including high end underground 1 1/4'' lines at about 160'. The heater will be at an easier location rather than the long lengthy process of feeding the current, inefficient, wood furnace in the basement.

I was originally going to build a quick and easy OHF to get me started. I have parts and plans for a second unit, collected as well, to make a downdraft gasser. This 1st unit consists of a tank in a tank build. I have an old school, solid home heating oil tank for the water jacket. I then got a free steal lawn roller that measures 48'' long with a 23 1/2'' dia. Perfect size for a burn chamber. Exhaust out the back and through the back of the heating oil tank. A door and a natural draft air feed.....KISS.

Plan A: I got the burn chamber 2 wks ago, and set it next to the oil tank. I then got to thinking of efficiency. And the brain storming began. My indoor wood furnace is an "updraft gasser." A second chamber at the back and sits horizontally. It's exhausted from the bottom, when the bypass at the top is closed, and fed heated air ,,, it works ok. If there are coals at the opening, it'll burn off most of the wood gas. It'll still smoke some out the chimney though, especially at idle.

Plan B: I got to thinking of longevity of the build. A thin walled burn chamber would burn out/rust out in a few years. Besides, the lawn roller has seam that's been repaired with some weld and there's a pin hole already on the edge from wear. Most likely why it was scrapped. I researched these last year when I first thought of using one. They're made with 12 or 14 gauge and cost $500 at TSC. I was excited to find the one I have until taking a good inspection of it.

I've decided to go with a thicker wall, of the same sized chamber. A friend of mine is an owner of a pipe fitting outfit. I'll most likely get something from him or, find an air compressor tank of a similar size. I have a vertical unit in my garage that needs a motor. I could use that if it's sizeable. I need to stay within a 24''dia. Anything much smaller is going to make feeding cumbersome. Oil tank measures 27'' across giving me an inch and a half on each side with the 24''dia....prefect for water circulation. I'll measure the compressor tank tomorrow. I have a 2nd vertical compressor with a 2 stage pump so, I don't mind sacrificing the other.

Plan C: Involves even better efficiency than the updraft.

I started thinking of secondary air tubes aka tube stove. Initial thoughts were of a sliding baffle plate at the top sitting on brackets, and with some air heated air fed tubes below. Baffle would be 3'' shorter than length of burn chamber. Slide it forwards via connecting rod out the front with a knob, above the door. That would put it in bypass mode. After loading, push the rod in to slide baffle back and exhaust thru front of chamber. I began to think of how much interior space this would use in the chamber. With a 6'' pipe flue coming from the back of chamber complicates space issues further. I want my exhaust to be horizontal and out the rear of the oil tank, easing installation before welding. This way the whole chamber can be slid in thru the front without trying to connect a horizontal flue pipe. I would have to box off a section, at the top inside, for a sliding baffle to work.

Revising this, with an 8'' square mild steel tube, welded on top of the burn chamber cylinder. It would run the full length plus thru the water and approximately 10'' out the back of the tank for 6'' chimney connection. The bottom of this tube would be cut out where it's welded to the cylinder. I'll refer this as the exhaust chamber. The cylinder will have 2 rectangular holes cut out, 8x3'' front and back. Using the cutouts, welded to a connecting rod, they would be positioned 3'' shorter than length of cylinder, and on each end of rod while leaving enough rod length to stick out past the front above the door. Slide forwards to open bypass and close the front hole. Slide back for normal operation.

I'm thinking of one 2'' square air tube about 3/4 the length of the cylinder, and close to the roof. Both sides and the bottom would have 1/8'' holes spaced an inch apart down the length. This single tube would run down underneath the center of the exhaust chamber, isolating it from cooler water temps. Air fed from a pair of 1'' round tubes coming from the face plate of cylinder, below the door. One near each corner. Interior of face plate will be shroud with K-wool blanket and boxed in the heavy gauged sheet. The feed tubes will be on the interior of the chamber, super heating the air supply, and connecting the front of the 2'' square tube. The square tube will fit into the supporting air tubes, while the back will sit in a bracket welded to the roof. Thus a replacement is easy to achieve.

Along with the 1'' of K-wool on the face plate, plans are for 5 lengthwise rows of fire brick on the bottom of cylinder with some sand tossed underneath supporting them. A few more against the rear plate will insulate the coal bed keeping it hot from cooler water. I'm factoring in an approximate sized door of 18'' tall by 16" wide. This will be insulated with 2'' K-wool and encased with 1/4'' steel. I'd like a 2'' round furnace sight glass for viewing the secondary burn. Primary air will enter the sides of the faceplate, and below the secondary intakes, via a connecting tube with a central solenoid operated draft door. Primary air will be delivered with a pair of 2'' square tubes with 3/8 holes drilled on 3'' spacing. These will also be replaceable and sit along the tops of the fire bricks. Of course, there will be some support brackets welded into the oil tank to support all this weight for the cylinder to sit on.

I'm considering extending the primary cross tube out away from the faceplate, allowing room for a secondary air cross tube manually adjustable intake. With this, and the sight glass, I can adjust the secondary for optimal burn at idle. Also considering a draft inducer via chimney, Polar furnace style, over natural draft.

I've calculated water volume to be a little over 200 gals. Cylinder calculates in at 94 gals, not including the smoke chamber. To use the full space of the oil tank, I'm adding an old 30 gal well pressure tank attached to the top fittings. Filled with about 15 gals will leave room for expansion and reach my goal of 200 for heating 4500 sq ft of house.

Goals are:
1. To burn off the smoke at idle, leaving the remaining functions of the water furnace as normal operation.
2, Good water circulation with supply from the bottom front of tank, and return at the top rear.
3. Have a furnace that will last much longer than my original plan. I'll be able to repurpose this to heat my future 48x40' shop and the 800ish sq ft rental house already here. That's after I gather the parts and materials, and build the downdraft gasser for the house. i do have a 420 gal LP tank for that burn chamber......

Again, sorry for the lengthy post. For all you furnace guys and tube stove owners, thoughts and criticisms are welcome.
 
Sounds like you have a good start on some plans.
I like to build stuff, and while building a gasser boiler would be fun, I well know it's gonna take a lot more time and money than is planned...which is easier to swallow if it actually works well, but what if it doesn't?
If I were to make the jump to boiler, I'd just buy a HeatMaster G series...or possibly a Polar.
The other option would be to go with a well built multipass unit, then add storage...light 'er up whenever the storage needs charged up.
 
Sounds like you have a good start on some plans.
I like to build stuff, and while building a gasser boiler would be fun, I well know it's gonna take a lot more time and money than is planned...which is easier to swallow if it actually works well, but what if it doesn't?
If I were to make the jump to boiler, I'd just buy a HeatMaster G series...or possibly a Polar.
The other option would be to go with a well built multipass unit, then add storage...light 'er up whenever the storage needs charged up.
With the downdraft gasser being my ultimate goal, I've researched the heck out of them. Especially the 5 yrs since I've been in this house that screams for an outdoor unit. The HeatMaster and Polar are my top 2 picks, if I was to buy one proven. Last year, there was a Polar G2 up for grabs, at a good price. In the neighborhood of $6500. Little undersized for my needs. This past summer, a G2 plus was listed for $5500 on FB. That would have been perfect. It was cosmetically clean but looked creosoted heavily inside. Seems folk around this area try to burn green chunks....LOL. And again, right now, another G2 at $5500. It's in good dirty condition. For my needs, I choose the twice a day loading schedule over a multi-pass with storage.

I don't have the funds for a commercial unit. To much going on in life, currently. What I can do is piece together a unit, and dust off my fabrication skills. I do have a 200amp MIG with 100% duty cycle.

This first build is an easy one. I think it will work well. The secondary air tubes is a recent thought. i have to get the ''ratio'' of air and chamber volume correct. I hope I'm on the right track. It would be sweet to extend the differential time of firing the primary air, while making heat from burning off the idling exhaust gasses.

If this build doesn't work well, the only failure part would be the secondaries. That's not much of a loss. It'll still function as a regular furnace. But if it works, it'll be well worth the effort and materials for the return investment. This will really push me to build a true gasser......
 
Revisiting the secondary tube design'

Been reading some old threads here in the pre EPA woodstove section. Threads where tubes have been retrofitted to older stoves. One thread got me thinking.

I'm understanding a hot combustion chamber is key to good secondaries. Since this is a fire box in water, I have a hurdle to overcome.
My original thought of a 2''sq tube came from a vid. It was our member D. Hermit and a mod he did to one of his Elm stove builds. It worked. This would enable me to keep a single tube under the center of my ''exhaust chamber" and running parallel. This was my thinking of isolating the secondary tube from fluctuating water temps. I'm not sure how well this will work. If I do stay with this design, I've decided on thin wall stainless for better heat transfer. SS for longevity.

Upon reading an older thread, I've learned why tube stoves are running tubes perpendicular to the exhaust flow. It helps achieve the desired combustion of gasses. Each tube helps heat the preceding tube before it.

I am now leaning to a ladder design. An air manifold on each side with the connecting tubes supplying the heated air for combustion. All thin walled SS, 1 1/2 or 2'' manifolds, and 1'' dia connecting tubes. Same sized holes and spacing. The width of the assembly is planned at 8-10 inches, keeping this under the smoke chamber as much as possible. I'll most likely go with the smaller manifolds to keep this unit tucked up high as possible. Also considering an inch of K-wool above wrapped in SS sheet, bottom and sides. Just like the face plate I previously mentioned.

Supply tubes on face plate will remain a thicker walled mild steel and the assembly will be supported by a bracket at the rear. First round tube will be about 5'' back from face plate leaving front exhaust port clear.

I think this is a better design overall.
 
Yeah any burn chamber surrounded by water will burn terribly cool/dirty.
The best cleanest burning units have insulated burn chambers to get the fire good n hot, then use a heat exchanger afterwards to pull temp out of the flue gasses.
 
Yeah any burn chamber surrounded by water will burn terribly cool/dirty.
The best cleanest burning units have insulated burn chambers to get the fire good n hot, then use a heat exchanger afterwards to pull temp out of the flue gasses.
No doubt.

I'm trying to keep this a simple build minus the tubes. I see smoke as wasted energy, much like diesel owners "rolling coal.'' If I can negate this some it'll be a plus. I'm hoping a draft inducer with a variable speed switch may be the work around. Possibly using the controller called the "Boiler Commander'' already has the speed switch. I think it has thermo probes for burn chamber and flue. If I can keep enough heat in the chamber and add some K-wool above the tubes, it may work.

Building something with a heat exchanger and an insulated chamber goes right into my gasser notes. This furnace is on a budget with the fuel oil tank and with as much scavenged material as possible. Ex. I have a commercial SS sink for the sheet I need for protecting the K-wool. My biggest expense is the controller and draft inducer.

Right now I'm mocking up my face plate and smoke chamber with cardboard. Aka, poor man's CAD ....LOL.
Just to get a perspective on sizing it all up. The door, primary/secondary inlets, interior space......
 
Besides, I'm actually enjoying this challenge.
Keeps me occupied and my mind from wandering in places I don't want to be.
 
Is "k-wool" ceramic insulation, or mineral wool?
The reason I ask is it sounds like you will be using a steel tank, then insulation, then ss over top? If so ceramic insulation has a known problem of absorbing moisture, and then not letting it go, even under firebox temps. The result over time is a rusted out combustion chamber.
Use mineral/rock wool, it'll dry out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: all night moe
Is "k-wool" ceramic insulation, or mineral wool?
The reason I ask is it sounds like you will be using a steel tank, then insulation, then ss over top? If so ceramic insulation has a known problem of absorbing moisture, and then not letting it go, even under firebox temps. The result over time is a rusted out combustion chamber.
Use mineral/rock wool, it'll dry out.
Ahh....thanks for the tip!
I appreciate it.

That's what this thread is about, avoiding mistakes in the early planning stage. Although, I'll continue my full build here as well.
 
I made my CAD faceplate and drew in the 1 1/4'' thick firebrick, secondary tube ladder assembly, and primary air ports.
A 18'' tall by 16'' wide door is looking a bit to big. A 16x16 ''fits'' better but, I fear it may be cumbersome loading the back of cylinder with wood. I wanted enough room for a viewing port above and enough faceplate wall below for coal containment. I may keep the 18'' door and put the sight glass in the top of door.

I'm going to shrink my primary air tubes down to 1 1/2 round. The 2'' sq seem obtrusive in the chamber. I also drew in 7 rows of the fire bricks. All parallel, 1 flat across the bottom, and 3 up each side. This places the primary tubes halfway up. I may place the tubes below the top row and between the proceeding row, or eliminate the top row altogether.
 
Anyone have any recommendations for the spacing of the secondary tubes?

They're 5-6'' long between the manifolds. I know that' s a bit short and only allows for about 5 holes each, spaced an inch apart. With the whole assembly at a 40'' length, I'm thinking that should make up for it.

I'm somewhat tempted to go with the original plan of one square 2'' tube running down the center, and with the mineral insulation above it. Any thoughts as to which to run with? I'm leaning to the ladder assembly myself.
 
Yeah any burn chamber surrounded by water will burn terribly cool/dirty.
The best cleanest burning units have insulated burn chambers to get the fire good n hot, then use a heat exchanger afterwards to pull temp out of the flue gasses.
I believe my Switzer firebox is surrounded by water.It doesn’t have any firebrick (well, there’s a bit of brick on the inside face of the box, but there’s air on the other side of that face) or grate and the wood is placed directly in contact with the metal. It does not burn cool or dirty, but we may be talking of different animals. This is a batch burner with induced draft, and other than the initial start up, I don’t let my tank water temp drop below 120*. When I fire it, I take it up to 200-215*.
 
  • Like
Reactions: all night moe
I believe my Switzer firebox is surrounded by water.It doesn’t have any firebrick (well, there’s a bit of brick on the inside face of the box, but there’s air on the other side of that face) or grate and the wood is placed directly in contact with the metal. It does not burn cool or dirty, but we may be talking of different animals. This is a batch burner with induced draft, and other than the initial start up, I don’t let my tank water temp drop below 120*. When I fire it, I take it up to 200-215*.
They are definitely different animals. I believe the Switzer to be a gasser?
Any pics of your draft inducer?
 
I checked the spare air compressor I have. It's measuring at a 20'' dia.
To small for my liking.

I'll be checking with my old neighbor for some steel pipe this spring.
 
They are definitely different animals. I believe the Switzer to be a gasser?
Any pics of your draft inducer?
Yes, it is a gasser. Here are some pics. I can’t get a picture of the actual inducer wheel right now. As you can see, the motor is three phase. There is a phase converter built into the control panel. I think the reason it’s a 3 phase is because it is variable speed. The controller slows the inducer motor down if the flue temps get above 320*. I’ve never reached that, so I’ve never actually seen the inducer slow down. Just out of curiosity, I tried to get my flue temps that high by leaving the bottom door open, but even then I couldn’t. During most of the burn, my flue temps (this is after the flue gasses have passed through the water storage three times, just downstream of the inducer) run 250-270*. Last pic is through the open top door into the firebox about mid burn.
[Hearth.com] My first Outdoor Hydronic Furnace build....OHF
[Hearth.com] My first Outdoor Hydronic Furnace build....OHF
[Hearth.com] My first Outdoor Hydronic Furnace build....OHF
[Hearth.com] My first Outdoor Hydronic Furnace build....OHF
[Hearth.com] My first Outdoor Hydronic Furnace build....OHF
[Hearth.com] My first Outdoor Hydronic Furnace build....OHF
 
That would be my guess, lil vfd in there...the motor itself is certainly nothing special.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sloeffle
This is too much work, just order a heatmaster gasification boiler and be done with it.
If I had the coin to SPARE I'd by a POLAR over the Heatmaster. Did you want to present me with a loan? ......LOL

Seriously, work has been extremely slow this year. I'm a contract climber aka arborist for hire. This past season has been slow for all companies in my area, and I have traveled up to 2hrs for a days work. Pay is good, but 1-2 days per/wk doesn't cut it. If it was a busy season, I would have bought the Used G2 Plus I mentioned previously for $5500. Folks around here don't understand what truly dry wood is and end up not liking gassers.

Yes, this is a bit of work and it's a lot less work than heating with the damn add on wood furnace pig in the basement. It eats 10 cord without a hiccup. The process of getting the wood down there is long and tedious. I need a furnace at the source. Acquiring parts before next season is the easy part. This should cost me easily less than $1500 minus the underground pex. Choosing 1 1/4'' Thermopex here.
I love to fabricate and my MIG is in the garage. A very capable 200A 100% duty cycle. Not some flux core junk. Besides, a very close friend is an iron worker who's considered the top welder in the local union..... should I need help.

I could build this quick and dirty, but that's not me. I'm taking the challenge.
I appreciate your opinion, and would have done just what you suggested if I could.
Maybe things will change in the foreseeable future. Maybe not.
 
Yes, I think you’re right. I didn’t word that correctly. I knew the motor was nothing special, but it’s been happy to do its job since installed. There might be a lesson in there…View attachment 344679
I think this is the same thing the "Boiler Commander" does. With the exception of the VFD. It's supposed to regulate fan speeds for all OWBs old and new by temperature demand. It would be the only other higher cost item if I go with it.
 
Yes, I think you’re right. I didn’t word that correctly. I knew the motor was nothing special, but it’s been happy to do its job since installed. There might be a lesson in there…View attachment 344679
Yup, the white controller in the middle with the red digital display is a VFD
 
  • Like
Reactions: all night moe
Hmm....are all blowers peed regulated by way of VFD and 3 phase motor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: all night moe
I didn't think so. The way Tonty's was done got me wondering.