Hello everyone!
I have a Continental CHMF200 wood furnace (A Napoleon HMF200 with blue paint instead of red) that I had installed at the end of March. I want to say up front that I love it for the most part - it burns hot, efficiently, and does an amazing job of heating my house. However, I believe there is a major defect with it, and I want to get some second thought on it before I chase it any further.
Design-wise, this furnace is basically a standard EPA firebox. However, the primary air supply is controlled by the upstairs thermostat - if the temperature is lower than the thermostat setting, the air supply is opened. If the room is warm enough, the primary air supply is closed. It can be overridden to open the primary air intake by manually locking the air control open (so the thermostat can't close it). You *can't* override it to close down the primary air intake if it wants to be open. The primary air is either 100% open or closed, there is no in-between state.
In the plenum above the heat exchange tubes, there is a thermosensor that trips at 250F and triggers the furnace blower to come on.
Now, in the manual, it specifies the following regarding the motor that opens the primary air control:
The bold sections imply that when the temp sensor in the plenum is tripped, the primary air supply should be closed down, and remain closed as long as the plenum temperature is above 250F.
To me, this makes perfect sense. As far as I am aware, this is how every non-catalytic EPA stove in the world operates - once the firebox is up to temp, you close down the primary air supply to trigger / improve the efficient secondary burn.
However, the unit as delivered does not do this, nor does a similar unit owned by my brother-in-law. There is no interconnect between the high limit switch in the plenum and the primary air control. This means that as long as the room thermostat is calling for more heat, the primary air control will remain wide open regardless of firebox temps.
This has led to some scary chimney temps, and caused me to go through a pile of wood before I realised what was happening.
I have been working around this as follows -
In my opinion, the furnace as delivered has a major and potentially dangerous defect. Furthermore, the automatic draft control is one of the features I bought this unit for - I actually read the manual before ordering it.
Accordingly, I followed up with my HVAC contractor, who in turn followed up with Napoleon with me on the line. The tech support person we spoke with confirmed that the behaviour we saw (primary air control operating *only* via thermostat) was the intended behaviour as there is no interconnection between the high limit switch in the primary air control. I wasn't satisfied, but I didn't have the manual in hand.
Today, I dug out the manual and found the section quoted above. I again spoke with their tech support (the same person as the first time around), this time with the manual page number handy. They reviewed the manual, and agreed with me that the manual indeed said the above, but that wasn't how the unit was actually built as there is no interconnect between the limit switch and the primary air control.
They are suggesting that I merely have a draft problem and will not go any further until I have my draft level checked.
I'm going to have that done, but I've been burning EPA wood stoves for over 10 years now. I understand how they work and how to efficiently and safely burn wood. I don't believe this is a draft issue - I think the design for this furnace was originally to have an interconnect between the high limit switch and the primary air control as per the manual, but it got deleted at some point.
I can't accept the only time we can get a good secondary burn by closing the primary air control is when the house is *already* at temperature. I have a large house, and it can take a full burn cycle to raise the temperature by 5 degrees on a cold winter day, or two cycles if the primary draft remains open the whole time (as is the apparent design).
I'd love some feedback on this. While I am managing it for myself with the workaround process I've described above, I think this is potentially a dangerous unit if allowed to manage it's own air control, in addition to being remarkably inefficient.
I don't want to be 'that guy', but I'm concerned that this is a dangerous issue and I want it resolved. I don't want someone else to overfire their furnace and chimney because they trusted the design of the primary air control.
To end on a positive note - I am supremely happy with the performance of this unit as far as efficiency and quality of burn goes, as long as I manage it the way I've described above. I just wish it worked the way the manual specifies without me having to use a workaround.
Edit: Add the manual page
I have a Continental CHMF200 wood furnace (A Napoleon HMF200 with blue paint instead of red) that I had installed at the end of March. I want to say up front that I love it for the most part - it burns hot, efficiently, and does an amazing job of heating my house. However, I believe there is a major defect with it, and I want to get some second thought on it before I chase it any further.
Design-wise, this furnace is basically a standard EPA firebox. However, the primary air supply is controlled by the upstairs thermostat - if the temperature is lower than the thermostat setting, the air supply is opened. If the room is warm enough, the primary air supply is closed. It can be overridden to open the primary air intake by manually locking the air control open (so the thermostat can't close it). You *can't* override it to close down the primary air intake if it wants to be open. The primary air is either 100% open or closed, there is no in-between state.
In the plenum above the heat exchange tubes, there is a thermosensor that trips at 250F and triggers the furnace blower to come on.
Now, in the manual, it specifies the following regarding the motor that opens the primary air control:
The control circuitry will energize the motor if it detects the room thermostat is calling for heat and the high limit sensor in the supply plenum has not been surpassed (greater than 250F (121C)). The primary air shutter will be fully opened and will remain so unless the room temperature has been satisfied or too much heat is detected in the plenum.
The bold sections imply that when the temp sensor in the plenum is tripped, the primary air supply should be closed down, and remain closed as long as the plenum temperature is above 250F.
To me, this makes perfect sense. As far as I am aware, this is how every non-catalytic EPA stove in the world operates - once the firebox is up to temp, you close down the primary air supply to trigger / improve the efficient secondary burn.
However, the unit as delivered does not do this, nor does a similar unit owned by my brother-in-law. There is no interconnect between the high limit switch in the plenum and the primary air control. This means that as long as the room thermostat is calling for more heat, the primary air control will remain wide open regardless of firebox temps.
This has led to some scary chimney temps, and caused me to go through a pile of wood before I realised what was happening.
I have been working around this as follows -
- I set the room thermostat to 10 degrees Celcius (50F) so that the primary air intake wants to be closed and leave it there 24/7.
- I override / lock the primary air intake open when I start the fire.
- When the firebox reaches operating temperature, I unlock the primary air control so it can close as per the thermostat signal. This triggers a wonderful secondary combustion burn.
In my opinion, the furnace as delivered has a major and potentially dangerous defect. Furthermore, the automatic draft control is one of the features I bought this unit for - I actually read the manual before ordering it.
Accordingly, I followed up with my HVAC contractor, who in turn followed up with Napoleon with me on the line. The tech support person we spoke with confirmed that the behaviour we saw (primary air control operating *only* via thermostat) was the intended behaviour as there is no interconnection between the high limit switch in the primary air control. I wasn't satisfied, but I didn't have the manual in hand.
Today, I dug out the manual and found the section quoted above. I again spoke with their tech support (the same person as the first time around), this time with the manual page number handy. They reviewed the manual, and agreed with me that the manual indeed said the above, but that wasn't how the unit was actually built as there is no interconnect between the limit switch and the primary air control.
They are suggesting that I merely have a draft problem and will not go any further until I have my draft level checked.
I'm going to have that done, but I've been burning EPA wood stoves for over 10 years now. I understand how they work and how to efficiently and safely burn wood. I don't believe this is a draft issue - I think the design for this furnace was originally to have an interconnect between the high limit switch and the primary air control as per the manual, but it got deleted at some point.
I can't accept the only time we can get a good secondary burn by closing the primary air control is when the house is *already* at temperature. I have a large house, and it can take a full burn cycle to raise the temperature by 5 degrees on a cold winter day, or two cycles if the primary draft remains open the whole time (as is the apparent design).
I'd love some feedback on this. While I am managing it for myself with the workaround process I've described above, I think this is potentially a dangerous unit if allowed to manage it's own air control, in addition to being remarkably inefficient.
I don't want to be 'that guy', but I'm concerned that this is a dangerous issue and I want it resolved. I don't want someone else to overfire their furnace and chimney because they trusted the design of the primary air control.
To end on a positive note - I am supremely happy with the performance of this unit as far as efficiency and quality of burn goes, as long as I manage it the way I've described above. I just wish it worked the way the manual specifies without me having to use a workaround.
Edit: Add the manual page
Attachments
Last edited: