In your opinion, which is the better stove and why? When I say "better", I'm thinking quality of construction, ease of use and heat output and any other thing you can think of that I didn't! Thanks

hotdawg said:In your opinion, which is the better stove and why? When I say "better", I'm thinking quality of construction, ease of use and heat output and any other thing you can think of that I didn't! Thanks![]()
Harman Lover 007 said:hotdawg said:In your opinion, which is the better stove and why? When I say "better", I'm thinking quality of construction, ease of use and heat output and any other thing you can think of that I didn't! Thanks![]()
I'm fairly certain you know what I'm gonna say.......
j-takeman said:I'd give an edge to the P38. Definetly a bit less picky with fuel. Both units have been around for a long time and don't hear all that much as far as complaints go. Don't expect much from either in the frills dept. Just the basics. Both do a nice job at throwing heat at you.
Let the dollar do some of the debating, How much they asking for them?
hotdawg said:Just wondering about the stoves and the top vs. bottom feed system of each. Is one better then the other or just a matter of preference?
DAKSY said:hotdawg said:Just wondering about the stoves and the top vs. bottom feed system of each. Is one better then the other or just a matter of preference?
The Harman units are a LOT more forgiving when it comes down to fuel quality.
they will self-adjust based on what the ESP reads from the exhaust gases.
The Enviro requires maual "tweaking" to get the air-to-fuel (ATF) ratio correct'
& may require adjustments every time you change your pellet brand...
The Harman uses incoming pellets to PUSH the ashes out of the burn pot. The
Enviro - or any drop feeder for that matter - uses the combustion blower to
evacuate the ashes from the burn pot. That works fine til you get a clinker that's
too big to be blown out, then you'll start getting less heat as less pellets can get
into the pot, until you MANUALLY remove that clinker. The Harman will require a
thorough cleaning after about 20 bags, or about 3 weeks of constant burning...
The Enviro will probably require a weekly cleaning...
You can probably tell which way I'm leaning as well...
hotdawg said:Harman Lover 007 said:hotdawg said:In your opinion, which is the better stove and why? When I say "better", I'm thinking quality of construction, ease of use and heat output and any other thing you can think of that I didn't! Thanks![]()
I'm fairly certain you know what I'm gonna say.......
What? Harman Lover are you saying I should get an Enviro? LOL. I guess I okay with either brand. Just wondering about the stoves and the top vs. bottom feed system of each. Is one better then the other or just a matter of preference?
rickwai said:It is not the easiest stove to lite compared to my st croix which is pellets a squirt of gel and match. turn on stove a leave for work. P38 I have to let burn w/ door open for 5 minutes or else to fire goes out due to to much air flow.
slls said:I believe Harman is the only bottom feeder on the market today, maybe still some Englander, old technology.
Any stove that runs continuous has to eat pellets, even on low, 24 hrs is a long time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.