So my Quadra Fire takes pumice bricks. ..

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

JA600L

Minister of Fire
Nov 30, 2013
1,292
Lancaster Pennsylvania
I had a lot of cracked and broken fire bricks so I let the stove die down and removed them. Upon contacting my dealer I found out that all of the side and back bricks need to be pumice. So I spent a small fortune and replaced them all. I put regular brick in the bottom. My question is will I notice any difference after replacing these? The stove is about 8 years old and had the original bricks. They were much thinner and cracked with lots of gaps before. Maybe I'm just trying to justify the money I spent. :)
 
IMHO, you will probably notice more complete combustion as the firebricks tend to allow less heat to get thru the sides where they're located & force the heat to stay in the combustion chamber. Whether or not you'll be able to justify the costs, I can't say. I will say that I think your dealer sold you a line of crap. A firebrick, whether clay or pumice, will do the same thing & work the same way. If they are a standard "split" brick, they are the same size & the only differences are the weight & the price. Clay split bricks are about 2 bucks (+/-) each. You probably paid more for pumice...
 
The biggest thing that I noticed is a more efficient complete burn. I load the stove full and it burns all night. I have plenty of coals for a relight and almost no ash. Before it was big chunks of coals and lots of ash.
 
I know that hearthstone and others use soapstone fire brick and I like the gentle heating cycle that they provide. I have also seen that soapstone bricks can be purchased and are the same size as other firebrick. Could one substitute soapstone for conventional fire brick in a non-hearthstone stove?

When I went to the local quadrafire store I noticed the insert they had running was hot as hates and unpleasant to be around. Not so with the hearthstone. I attributed this to the firebrick differences. I could be wrong.
 
So in my Quad 2 of the back bricks have a hole in them for start-up air tubes....can I just drill out holes in regular pumice bricks? The link Green gave has a price a fraction of what Quadrafire charges
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I drilled in hole in a standard firebrick when I had my Quad. I can't believe the pumice brick would be that much harder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArsenalDon
So in my Quad 2 of the back bricks have a whole in them for start-up air tubes....can I just drill out holes in regular pumice bricks? The link Green gave has a price a fraction of what Quadrafire charges

I would suggest more of a hole saw, than a drill bit (yes I have bits that size). A hole saw will have less chance of cracking the bricks. Not all hole saws are created equal. You will want one designed to go through brick. One example:
(broken link removed to http://www.zorotools.com/g/00095214/k-G3962393?utm_source=Bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=PLA)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArsenalDon
You'd think Pumice bricks are inferior to heavy refractory ceramic bricks but the truth is they absorb more heat and are superior in many ways
 
Status
Not open for further replies.