BrotherBart said:An Elm with headers. Or a barrel stove with a nice stand. Can't decide. :lol:
BeGreen said:Flames on the side need to be candy apple red. I like the Design unit a bit better. And they have one for the stoners too.
I didn't find any EPA testing on these units. Any idea of how cleanly they burn?
Pagey said:BeGreen said:Flames on the side need to be candy apple red. I like the Design unit a bit better. And they have one for the stoners too.
I didn't find any EPA testing on these units. Any idea of how cleanly they burn?
Why, clean enough to put a $5,000 grand piano in the same room and not have to worry about dust and soot, obviously! :lol:
LLigetfa said:I disagree. There were lots of tests done back when they first came on the market and there is considerable airflow through the tubes.
BrotherBart said:Future hearth.com thread.
"What if I attach flex pipes to the tubes and extend them into the bedrooms upstairs?".
LOLBrotherBart said:Future hearth.com thread.
"What if I attach flex pipes to the tubes and extend them into the bedrooms upstairs?".
Milt said:I am thinking that the primary function of the tubes is to increase the surface area exposed to the heat source. That would make the tubes functional. I doubt that the air flow would turn a pinwheel, but the hot air has no choice but to exit the top. It would function no better than a sheet steel stove with the same surface area inside and out.