Which one is a better log splitter
- Thread starter Itslay90
- Start date
-
Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.
We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.
We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
![[Hearth.com] Which one is a better log splitter](/talk/data/attachments/339/339175-d3a42aa52d18b1a81822696ea63e01e8.jpg?hash=xo-lTIhRzt)
![[Hearth.com] Which one is a better log splitter](/talk/data/attachments/339/339176-7831f98cd3fe591933f4f21df8896d03.jpg?hash=Lj3FUAs4FG)
Looks like the same design, and almost the same tonnage. Cycle time of each? Cost is probably similar. Either should get the job done. Maybe inspect the assembly - oil levels, connections, etc... The splitter came to the store in a box and was assembled by someone. So check how well it was put together.
I would start each one and run it through a pretend cycle (if possible). Which engine feels more user friendly?
Look at the welds, too. Which one has better hydraulic lines? The knife and back plate are the business ends of any splitter - which knife and back plate are better and tougher looking? Check the knife design - is it narrow or wide?
This is very important - how does the knife move through the channel - each splitter can be slightly different - which one looks more durable when it is sliding (weak point because over time warping/bending can occur). And do you get zero, one, or two little side tables/cradles with the splitter? This makes a big difference as it gives you some place to put the partially split wood. Good luck!
I would start each one and run it through a pretend cycle (if possible). Which engine feels more user friendly?
Look at the welds, too. Which one has better hydraulic lines? The knife and back plate are the business ends of any splitter - which knife and back plate are better and tougher looking? Check the knife design - is it narrow or wide?
This is very important - how does the knife move through the channel - each splitter can be slightly different - which one looks more durable when it is sliding (weak point because over time warping/bending can occur). And do you get zero, one, or two little side tables/cradles with the splitter? This makes a big difference as it gives you some place to put the partially split wood. Good luck!
Last edited:
I have a Brave 7-ton that I really over worked. I split big wood on it, too. If it couldn't split the wood it would just stop. The knife broke off. It lasted 15 years and many a cord. It was over built. Now what? I had a big pile of wood to split. I bought a like new Champion 9-ton log splitter. It lasted 2 days. A couple pieces of elm and the Champion had a bent cylinder rod. The design is flawed. The moving pusher would pop out of its channels when it was strained (the Brave was designed to never do this). I pretty much gave the Champion to an older guy who only needed to split little wood (the rod wasn't bent too bad).
The Brave was much tougher and fought above its weight (the steel was harder, too). The Champion had soft steel and was only good for branch sized wood. What does a 9-ton Champion have to do with a 27-ton splitter? Design precision and steel grade are shown in the little machines which have to work harder to split wood.
The Speeco/Countyline design has been around a long time. I think I would trust it more than the Champion which has been around for 5 to 10 years. The Countyline usually has the Kohler engine - I had the innards of a Kohler engine go rusty on me (Honda to the rescue). I would rather have a Briggs or Honda engine (if available).
This is some of the stuff that happens to splitters that are so-so made. He fixes it somehow, but it doesn't pop off at the end of the cycle. He has to reach back and hit the lever. These little flaws add up (splitter at around 2:40).
The Brave was much tougher and fought above its weight (the steel was harder, too). The Champion had soft steel and was only good for branch sized wood. What does a 9-ton Champion have to do with a 27-ton splitter? Design precision and steel grade are shown in the little machines which have to work harder to split wood.
The Speeco/Countyline design has been around a long time. I think I would trust it more than the Champion which has been around for 5 to 10 years. The Countyline usually has the Kohler engine - I had the innards of a Kohler engine go rusty on me (Honda to the rescue). I would rather have a Briggs or Honda engine (if available).
This is some of the stuff that happens to splitters that are so-so made. He fixes it somehow, but it doesn't pop off at the end of the cycle. He has to reach back and hit the lever. These little flaws add up (splitter at around 2:40).
Last edited:
I have a County Line splitter, but mine runs on my tractor hydraulics so no small engine. It's been a good splitter. That said I have a Champion Generator and winch, both have been excellent and the few times I needed customer support they were excellent. Only support I needed was a couple of questions and to purchase some maintenance parts.
Yes I got the
Champion 27 ton log splitter I only have 11 hours on it. This year I will probably double that because I’m getting a truck load of logs this year
I like Kohler. Does it now come equipped with a Kohler? My unit came equipped with a Champion, but I have had zero problems with it and it starts on the first pull. While we’re here, I’ll point out, IMO, a major design flaw in the cover to the air filter. I believe storm water will seep down past the nuts that secure the cover on top and seep past the hose on the vapor evaporator (?) eventually filling the chamber and flooding the carburetor and the cylinder, thus damaging the engine. Regardless, IMO all equipment should be covered when it’s possible. At the very least, I cover the engine with a tub or white trash bag.
I've always sworn by the GX series of Hondas, the lore is that the GX's are still made with better materials and for a more long lived existence than the GC series which were targeted to a lighter duty environment. Not sure if that still holds true but my GX200 starts first pull and lives outside under a plastic storage bin that I throw over it.
Every brand of splitter has it’s own set of issues. Some have cheap motors, some have cheap valves, the list goes on. I would get the one with the beat build quality and upgrade the valve or other parts as needed. Just the way it is.
I have a speeco that I picked up for free because it was torn apart and they damaged some parts in the process. I fixed it and it works well, but I don’t use it unless I am breaking down big rounds to feed the push through splitter that I built. That one gets used over 99% of the time. I notmally lift big rounds with the bobcat and set them on it.
I have been thinking of putting the speeco beam on a plate for the bobcat and using it as a machine mounted splitter. At least then I would use it more.
I have a speeco that I picked up for free because it was torn apart and they damaged some parts in the process. I fixed it and it works well, but I don’t use it unless I am breaking down big rounds to feed the push through splitter that I built. That one gets used over 99% of the time. I notmally lift big rounds with the bobcat and set them on it.
I have been thinking of putting the speeco beam on a plate for the bobcat and using it as a machine mounted splitter. At least then I would use it more.
Rehlko is an anagram of Kohler. I wonder why they would ditch a well known, respected name for one no one has ever heard of.
Do it...my brother made one that he uses to bust the huge stuff into pieces that can be handled on the splitter, works out really well when you get a lot of large/gnarly stuff like he does.
I have a TON of big logs stacked along the driveway. I’d guess at least 35 cord now. Some of them are BIG.
