First off, if there has already been a substantive discussion of this, I'd appreciate being pointed to a link.
But to the meat of the matter:
If the Blaze King burn longevity and heat output stories here can be credited as at least true in part, what is it about their design and construction that makes them (apparently) so remarkable... so much (apparently) better than other respected stove brands in these respects?
While I can anticipate a lively thread, I'd really prefer it (good luck, PB) if posters restrict themselves to describing design details they think are significant and/or opinions that can be _substantiated_.
And not to tall tales about 36 hour burns...
Yeah, I could imagine a Chinook in my (distant) future.
What makes it a better bet than a PE Super for example?
Thanks.
Peter B.
-----
But to the meat of the matter:
If the Blaze King burn longevity and heat output stories here can be credited as at least true in part, what is it about their design and construction that makes them (apparently) so remarkable... so much (apparently) better than other respected stove brands in these respects?
While I can anticipate a lively thread, I'd really prefer it (good luck, PB) if posters restrict themselves to describing design details they think are significant and/or opinions that can be _substantiated_.
And not to tall tales about 36 hour burns...
Yeah, I could imagine a Chinook in my (distant) future.
What makes it a better bet than a PE Super for example?
Thanks.
Peter B.
-----