- Jun 4, 2012
- 28
All my questions have been answered by searching through the forums here (thanks to everyone) except these 2.
I am in the process of purchasing a wood stove for supplemental heating for my 1350 sg ft, 70's, ranch home in southern Wisconsin. I have narrowed my choices down to either a Drolet Escape or a Drolet Celtic ( wife likes this one). One of my questions is the 1.5 cu ft firebox of the Celtic vs the 2.4 cu ft firebox on the Escape. Would I use more wood using the larger firebox building small fires and would I need more wood in the stove to heat it up? In other words would it be more efficient using a smaller stove vs larger stove when it comes to wood usage? I don't always want to use the blower ( looking for more radiant heat from the stove).
My 2nd question has to do with baffle design on these 2 stoves. The Celtic is welded in and not replaceable vs the Escape which has replaceable tubes. Should I be concerned about the welded in design?
Thanks so much in advance for your help!
I am in the process of purchasing a wood stove for supplemental heating for my 1350 sg ft, 70's, ranch home in southern Wisconsin. I have narrowed my choices down to either a Drolet Escape or a Drolet Celtic ( wife likes this one). One of my questions is the 1.5 cu ft firebox of the Celtic vs the 2.4 cu ft firebox on the Escape. Would I use more wood using the larger firebox building small fires and would I need more wood in the stove to heat it up? In other words would it be more efficient using a smaller stove vs larger stove when it comes to wood usage? I don't always want to use the blower ( looking for more radiant heat from the stove).
My 2nd question has to do with baffle design on these 2 stoves. The Celtic is welded in and not replaceable vs the Escape which has replaceable tubes. Should I be concerned about the welded in design?
Thanks so much in advance for your help!