Are Wood Stoves Going the Way of the Horse and Buggy?
- Thread starter Parallax982
- Start date
-
Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.
We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.
We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
ColoradoPine
New Member
What do you mean by "cleaner"? Fewer particulates? Yes. But that is not the same thing as fewer new carbon molecules being released into the atmosphere.
Natural gas burns carbon that has been trapped deep within the Earth and would not otherwise be released. Wood burns carbon that would have been released as the wood decayed anyway. So, from a carbon standpoint, wood is carbon neutral. Natural gas is not.
ColoradoPine
New Member
Assuming you aren't cutting down living trees for firewood, there's no need to plant new trees in order to be carbon neutral. The carbon contained in the dead tree you are burning would have been released as the wood decayed anyway. The same cannot be said for natural gas, which burns carbon that was trapped deep within the Earth and would not have been released anyway.
Well some of it would be released into the atmosphere some would be injested by bugs and some would end up in the ground. Its still about as close to carbon neutral as it gets. But it is not.
Yes, unless covering up a crime scene. Otherwise, generally a good thing.
Some years ago, my town cut down a bunch of trees on land right near my house. They were planning on putting in an access road that they later realized was impractical without major engineering that they had no interest in paying for. So the result was a loss of maybe a couple of dozen trees. I then went out and purchased twice as many Douglas firs and tried to replant them. Only a handful took. Others have since grown back in independently. Will be years before the damage is fully undone. But it had an impact on my son, who was maybe three at the time. He and his mom had been really upset by the cutting of those trees. They were crying together, which was what motivated me to call the town and give the guy in charge hell. The replanting gave him a sense that losses can be assuaged. There was a kind of optimism. Tree planting is good for the human heart and human soul.
Some years ago, my town cut down a bunch of trees on land right near my house. They were planning on putting in an access road that they later realized was impractical without major engineering that they had no interest in paying for. So the result was a loss of maybe a couple of dozen trees. I then went out and purchased twice as many Douglas firs and tried to replant them. Only a handful took. Others have since grown back in independently. Will be years before the damage is fully undone. But it had an impact on my son, who was maybe three at the time. He and his mom had been really upset by the cutting of those trees. They were crying together, which was what motivated me to call the town and give the guy in charge hell. The replanting gave him a sense that losses can be assuaged. There was a kind of optimism. Tree planting is good for the human heart and human soul.
Up here in the mountains of TN I can't see it going away in my lifetime. Many people heat with wood as the primary if not only heat source. The Fatboy propane tank I see couldn't do much in a pinch. This time of year I see many piles of pine trunks in a yard being processed, it's just too easy and cheap.
I have more wood to burn than I will in my lifetime and lots more on the way. There are 100s of saplings each year I have to deal with around the house. Since these pines are just waiting to fall, not if but when, I get rid of them close to the place but let them go further out in the woods.
I can understand the problems y'all have with the Ken and Karens in some areas. They run on emotions rather than reason. It was said and is true, one ice storm will make a lot of people rethink the total dependence on the electrical grid. It's just sad it'll be such a sharp lesson to learn.
I have more wood to burn than I will in my lifetime and lots more on the way. There are 100s of saplings each year I have to deal with around the house. Since these pines are just waiting to fall, not if but when, I get rid of them close to the place but let them go further out in the woods.
I can understand the problems y'all have with the Ken and Karens in some areas. They run on emotions rather than reason. It was said and is true, one ice storm will make a lot of people rethink the total dependence on the electrical grid. It's just sad it'll be such a sharp lesson to learn.
Honestly there is really very little widespread push against woodstoves. There are some areas prone to air inversions where the smoke just lays there and is pretty unpleasant. Those are generally the areas with no burn days and stricter regulations. And anyone who has lived next to someone who smolders wet wood all day will eventually get annoyed. Nothing we can do about the air inversion areas. But proper burning techniques with good fuel will avoid most problems even with old stoves.
Wood stove regulations have gotten more strict over the years. Where I live, there have been no burn bans in the cold months. But my son tells me that where he lives, one can no longer burn. I've not asked if this is 100 percent of the time or only here or there. It's enough for him, as a home owner and home flipper, to feel any fireplace or wood stove needs to be replaced with something artificial or removed entirely. He's in California.
Yes, our geography does lead to occasional wood burning bans in some years. They are a good idea when there is a major temperature inversion with no air flow between mountain ranges. FWIW, we didn't have one last year.
CA has a lot of air quality issues. Most of the bans there apply to urban areas, namely in the LA and SF region. Flippers and real estate agents have very different objectives from a homeowner. They don't pay the future utility bills.
CA has a lot of air quality issues. Most of the bans there apply to urban areas, namely in the LA and SF region. Flippers and real estate agents have very different objectives from a homeowner. They don't pay the future utility bills.
Definitely. My son, when looking at a house, doesn't consider what he wants or considers attractive. He looks at what sells most easily. Of course that too can be a guessing game. But he seems to have a good sense of it. If there were widespread demand for wood stoves, he'd put them in. That he replaces or rips them out tells me he doesn't think most people want them these days.
Similar threads
