For you cat guys out there (full time burners) and hypothetically speaking what is the price point for a cat at which you would say switch back to a non-cat or perhaps flip on the ol furnance.
For you cat guys out there (full time burners) and hypothetically speaking what is the price point for a cat at which you would say switch back to a non-cat or perhaps flip on the ol furnance.
The new Woodstock Survival is 1.2 cubic feet but is top exit only and a stand alone unit.All the cat stoves I know of are 2.3 cu ft or larger
They would find out quickly that price is a factor for most people. We work on many cat stoves with no cat because people couldt afford a new one or just dodnt want to pay for one. Granted most of them are older units that burnt through cats faster. Mainly vermont castings.Obviously this thread represents a tiny blip of the total cat users out there. That said given the feedback on "price is not a factor" it would seem that the cat producers might be missing out on a serious pricing opportunity. While it might not be a sexy space i'm not sure whats stopping some PE group from scooping up a few cat companies and jacking the price.
Wonder if the T6 can be retrofitted to handle an unobtainium combustor?Well, I'm in the cat seat if Purrcromium goes through the roof as I have a hybrid.
Having a stove that can do low-and-slow lets me heat with 100% wood in a house where everyone works full time. I don't believe there's a noncat option for that outside of a wood furnace.
I really dont know why you guys think tube stives take lots of messing with. I load mine 3 times a day and after loading i touch it twice in a span of 10 to 15 mins. Then i am done for 8 to 10 hours.I would switch to a tube stove if I was just doing supplemental heat in the dead of winter- not too much difference between them in that scenario. It would also be ok if I was retired, and had all day to mess with starting fires and managing the temperature indoors.
Having a stove that can do low-and-slow lets me heat with 100% wood in a house where everyone works full time. I don't believe there's a noncat option for that outside of a wood furnace.
As do many many others very happily. I have absolutly nothing against cat stoves they work great for many people. It just bothers me when guys act like that is the only way you can heat your house full time with wood.i heat full time in a rather cold area without a cat stove, the only time the oil boiler is used is if we go away for a few days
As do many many others very happily. I have absolutly nothing against cat stoves they work great for many people. It just bothers me when guys act like that is the only way you can heat your house full time with wood.
I heat just fine when it is 40 or 50 out with my non cat. And no i dont open a window . Yes at those temps a cat stove would be easier. But doing it with a non cat is not hard at all.When it's 20-30 degrees out, I see your point. When it's 40-50, I do not. I grew up with noncat stoves.
My parent have had had no other source of heat in their house for over 40 years now. And they have never had a cat stove. Same for my uncle and many of our customers. There are many many non cat options that will do it just fineI would switch to a tube stove if I was just doing supplemental heat in the dead of winter- not too much difference between them in that scenario. It would also be ok if I was retired, and had all day to mess with starting fires and managing the temperature indoors.
Having a stove that can do low-and-slow lets me heat with 100% wood in a house where everyone works full time. I don't believe there's a noncat option for that outside of a wood furnace.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.