Fire Chief FC1000 year 2

Mrpelletburner Posted By Mrpelletburner, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:29 PM

  1. KC Matt

    KC Matt
    Burning Hunk 2.
    NULL
    

    Oct 29, 2016
    116
    76
    Loc:
    Kansas City
    I'm so grateful I read a couple forums prior to purchasing my furnace. The Tundra did have shortcomings from the factory but I knew that going in and I built a system that makes it work incredibly well. I don't know how these guys are able to keep their cool dealing with these Firechief death traps.
     
  2. Mrpelletburner

    Mrpelletburner
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Jan 20, 2011
    522
    139
    Loc:
    Mass
    So you aren’t in the market for a used FC? Just asking
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    brenndatomu likes this.
  3. KC Matt

    KC Matt
    Burning Hunk 2.
    NULL
    

    Oct 29, 2016
    116
    76
    Loc:
    Kansas City
    LOL! You're a better man than I.

    The only suitable use for that POS is at the scrap yard.
     
    brenndatomu likes this.
  4. JRHAWK9

    JRHAWK9
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Jan 8, 2014
    1,127
    746
    Loc:
    Wisconsin Dells, WI
    Just in case you guys running these Hy-C things want to upgrade for cheap. ;lol ;)


    upload_2019-1-6_10-19-43.png
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. Mrpelletburner

    Mrpelletburner
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Jan 20, 2011
    522
    139
    Loc:
    Mass
    Had a 2hr call with HY-C on Friday. Going on almost a year and they are still working with me, trying to get things right. Their prior stove line had a great reputation, seems like they trying to go the distance to get back to that point.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    brenndatomu likes this.
  6. Mojappa

    Mojappa
    Member 2.
    NULL
    

    Mar 14, 2018
    122
    113
    Loc:
    Gerrardstown, WV
    One would think the first thing they’d suggest would be a barometric damper to get your draft in check.....lol
     
    STIHLY DAN and brenndatomu like this.
  7. Mrpelletburner

    Mrpelletburner
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Jan 20, 2011
    522
    139
    Loc:
    Mass
    They’re VERY adamant that the stove should not have a barometric damper connected. The design of the stove should prevent a high draft. I don’t know enough of the design to argue the point. Therefore the only thing I can do is work with them, provide data, and hope they can get the stove to deliver the advertised burn times.

    I do think they should pause sales on the FC1000 until the back puffing can be resolved.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    woodey and brenndatomu like this.
  8. Mojappa

    Mojappa
    Member 2.
    NULL
    

    Mar 14, 2018
    122
    113
    Loc:
    Gerrardstown, WV
  9. laynes69

    laynes69
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Oct 2, 2006
    2,425
    351
    Loc:
    Ashland OH
    I don't see how they can say that. According to the EPA testing, if the unit was tested at .06" of water column and the furnace is installed with a chimney producing .10"+ of water column, how can they claim it's made to run without a barometric damper? One would believe the furnace would need to run within specs of the emissions testing? It makes zero sense.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    STIHLY DAN, woodey, sloeffle and 4 others like this.
  10. Mojappa

    Mojappa
    Member 2.
    NULL
    

    Mar 14, 2018
    122
    113
    Loc:
    Gerrardstown, WV
    Maybe they secretly installed a baro inside the stove and just don’t wanna tell anybody? Hahaha. It really is mind blowing seeing the approach they’re taking.
     
    brenndatomu likes this.
  11. JRHAWK9

    JRHAWK9
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Jan 8, 2014
    1,127
    746
    Loc:
    Wisconsin Dells, WI

    I agree, Lamppa can't change anything after passing their phase 2 testing. They can't even sell the water coil with them anymore because it was not in place when they were certified.

    Along those same lines, I also don't understand how these cat stoves can become certified either. It's well known the cat starts to degrade immediately and over time it is shot and needs to be replaced. So, assuming they were tested with a brand new cat, this means at what point does it fall out of compliance? Then they have the bypass, which the end user can use to bypass the cat at any point. Without a cat, these things are not much more than a barrel stove. ;lol

    Wood furnaces are testing at three distinct burn levels and are done to simulate all conditions in which the end user will use them. This includes forcing the furnace to burn at a very low heat output level. Once compliance has been achieved then they are not allowed to change anything; meanwhile these cat stoves have a simple lever they can pull to bypass the cat and the cat is also in the constant state of degradation. By design they are in a constant state of change! :rolleyes:

    Personally, I know I'm glad I don't own a cat equipped wood burning anything. With my personality, wanting to achieve/maintain maximum efficiency, I could see myself replacing the cat every year or at any initial sign of degradation....whatever interval that would be.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    woodey, sloeffle and brenndatomu like this.
  12. brenndatomu

    brenndatomu
    Minister of Fire 2.
    NULL
    

    Aug 21, 2013
    3,950
    1,436
    Loc:
    NE Ohio
    Can't agree enough! They have figured out how to get these things to pass the EPA test...but that is not how they actually get run in the real world...and no where near the burn times they claim! (read the EPA test report) And it completely blows my mind that that they got the FC1000 to pass at all! The good thing is that if they are still in the wood furnace game in 2020, they will either have to get their crap together, or be gone!
    See, this is why I think that the FC "engineers" are a bunch of college grad newbs (or maybe they flunked out of college ;lol) you have to control your draft!! It is the engine that drives the stove!! Not the other way around!!
    If controlling the chimney draft with the furnace was possible (or a good idea) wouldn't a computer controlled Kuuma do that?!
    Or one of the many European lambda units...none of them control the chimney draft via the furnace (boiler) either!
    Heck, Kuuma even supply's the baro with the furnace.

    I'm starting to build a callous on my forehead from reading these FC guys responses/ideas :confused:
    Like Laynes said, makes ZERO sense!

    You need to be on their payroll...you are doing R n D for them...
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    STIHLY DAN, woodey, JRHAWK9 and 2 others like this.

Share This Page