Hearthstone vs Progress, bee in bonnet

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
It makes sense. The saleswoman there wasn't about to tell me that. She explicitly told me they would be about the same at the low end. I've heard so much good about the Woodstock people I can't muster the cynicism to think she lied to sell me a stove. She also showed me a printout of a table with the stoves and their outputs, and it was pretty crazy, all over the place. She said, Yeah, tested at different times, different tests. I can't remember specifics of that table (a lot in it), but she said basically don't put any stock in the tests, because they are not the same test. She said she's never heard of anyone who got cooked out by the Progress being too much stove. I've also never seen anyone in a forum anywhere saying they had that problem with a Progress. (Of course it could be I'm the only one stupid enough to install one in a smaller space.) IDK maybe if I had gotten a different sales person I would have gotten a different view?

I also measured the fireboxes the long way. The Fireview they say it takes 16 inch logs, but it's at least 18 inches long. My Jotul 3 FCB is the exact opposite. They say it will burn 18 inch logs, but they better mostly be shorter than that. You can just barely fit an 18 inch log into it if there's nothing else going on in the stove, no coals or other logs.

The size difference of the fireboxes between the Fireview and the Progress is dramatic if you can see them both in the same room. The Progress has a crazy huge firebox.

Also talked to the stove installer (I think I mentioned that?). He installs for Woodstock around here (they give out his name) and he actually owns two of their stoves himself. I went through all of our situation and the stoves I was wondering about, and he basically came down to, "The Progress is one really good stove."

Hybrid + firebox makes sense though, as you say and bigger stove.

I'm not too worried about our use though. As I've said, basically we only light the stove when the 15k mini split is struggling. In other words, we need probably 12 or 13k of heat if not more to even think of making a fire. And that's in the warmest weather of stove use. Our burn season is shorter than many wood burners because of the mini splits I guess. I suppose we might want to avoid firing the stove on a chilly morning when it's going to warm up a lot during the day. Or we will make a fire with a small load and treat it like a little masonry stove. I will surely be wary of loading the firebox all the way full on a milder day, so we can let it coast down if need be. We'll see! Hope I'm not making a mistake.

Also in spite of the warnings in this thread, I haven't found a forum thread anywhere with anyone cooking themselves out with a Progress.

Also, my wife doesn't like the look of the Fireview. I kind of like it, I think of it as "trippy-funky," and I think it would be appropriate in our old schoolhouse. But we both agree we like the Progress better.

Hope I don't regret it, but I'm more excited than apprehensive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Todd
If it doesn’t work out they have a 6 month return policy so might as well give it a try. I’ll be interested to see how it works out.

You’re right about the different testing over the years. The EPA keeps changing the methods to their madness. None of them are real world tests because there are so many variables in wood burning.
 
Hi! I'm in a similar boat, considering the Progress Hybrid but wondering if its overkill for the space. Its not a big house, its a new build with 8 ft ceilings and will be well insulated. I wanted to go with a hybrid stove for the efficiency and the environmental benefit, plus to my understanding it requires less maintenance and cleaning due to the secondary combustion? Since the Fireview is cat only I was leaning toward the PH.

Also a bit frantic trying to decide since I'm hoping to have it installed by December for the tax credit but who knows if thats possible given all the uncertainty already discussed.

I've attached the house plans for anyone curious. Its also not entirely clear to me how many rooms/what portion of a house a wood stove effectively heats...there's an upstairs thats not pictured, its only above the 26x 30 box, and has 2 bedrooms. Would the PH or fireview effectively heat those as a primary heat source? I assume based on common sense that it won't heat the ADU through closed doors and a mudroom, unless there's something basic I dont understand about how heat circulates.

Anyway this forum is a great resource, thanks for sharing all your knowledge!
[Hearth.com] Hearthstone  vs Progress, bee in bonnet
 
There is little to no difference between the PH and Fireview in efficiency or emissions. The PH probably burns cleaner at higher burn rates in epa tests but you’re not going to burn like that. Both stoves are very close at lower burn rates where you will mostly be burning. I would call Woodstock and ask them which stove would be a better fit.
 
Having talked to and visited Woodstock lately, my sense is they are not going to steer you strongly between these two stoves. If you’re wobbling between them, they’ll let you wobble a bit I think and land with your inclination. I suppose there might be a different sales person, but I talked to two different women with the same style. I appreciate this style of salesmanship on the one hand, but if looking for strong guidance of what to do, it’s slightly frustrating. On the other hand, I (we) landed on the Progress, and I feel good about how I got here, might have felt more doubt if I had been “pushed” a bit more by outside influence. Who knows.

One thing though is if you want to get it for sure this fall, when I was there they were actually building Fireviews. She said I could get one in two weeks (a couple of weeks ago when I was there). The Progress is a bit less clear. I guess they expect to start building those in a couple of weeks, but as of a few weeks ago the EPA approval for crib wood was more like penciled in than inked in. She also told me that the way they usually work is one worker builds one stove, but right now they are working in an assembly line style. I shouldn’t speculate on what exactly that means for delivery, but I’m guessing that whatever they are building/shipping right now is a more likely stove to obtain this fall, or earlier in the fall anyway. Who knows, maybe they have switched to building Progress over Fireview already, or are working on the steel stove.

When I talked to an installer, who has experience with them and who is penciled in to install my Progress, about selling my current stove right now and counting on the Progress being delivered on time (late October), he said, “Don’t sell the Jotul yet!”

There is of course a cost difference, and a big IMO aesthetic difference. I thought the Fireview looked different in person than in photos. The official photos of that stove seem to be taken from a lower angle than eye level. From standing (and I’m not tall), it looks a bit more short and squat than I was expecting. The Fireview has a distinctive presence, which can cut either way I guess if you have strong opinions. On first glance (photo) I loved the Fireview’s looks, but as I saw it more, I liked the look rather less. My wife was with me on that. I could easily see it going the other way for someone else.

The Progress on the other hand is much more neutral, but not blandly neutral, the way a nicely designed Mercedes is a bit neutral but not at all blandly so. It doesn’t shout “I am an elegant and nice car!” It just is one. (I do not and have not owned a Mercedes and probably never will, but I appreciate that aspect of their design.)

I also don’t know for sure how having this stove will change our burning habits — if we will in fact keep it going all night and wake up to a warm stove, or if we will continue our habit of letting the stove go out at night, the temperature drops with mini split to hold it at 60 or whatever, and then light the stove in the morning. (No way to keep a fire going in our current Jotul all night, so this is how we roll). So, if we burn with this old habit, my sense is the Progress with throw more heat through the larger glass right away. Also the larger glass and secondary burn will have a different experience of the fire, especially in colder weather when burning a little harder? Just guessing on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Highbeam
Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts! Woodstock just confirmed the fireview would be ready sooner since they are currently being built.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Todd
The PH may be getting recertified. If so, the question is whether it will be in time for the Dec 2025 tax credit deadline. The Fireview has a current letter of certification. Note that consumers also need to request the QM number from the dealer. Word is that without the QM number, no credit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Todd
Yeah, that certification is supposed to be “in progress.” I’m biting my nails a bit about whether it happens soon. Or might be basically done but needing some finalization. But impending government shutdown = EPA shutdown = more delays in this kind of thing. Also wonder if the timing = payment date vs delivery of stove. We did solar panels just before a change for the worse in the net metering in Vermont. In that case, it was by the contract/payment rather than the installation. We met the deadline on the former, but the panels were installed after.

Don’t mind burning this Jotul November through mid December, but by New Years or so, now that I’ve got the bee in my bonnet, I’ll want a better stove, and in particular the Progress.

Also, I’ve just cut and bucked and split and stacked a handful of small to medium ash trees, and I’ve cut them to 21 inches! (It’s for ‘26-‘27) Don’t want to re-cut all this wood!
 
The PH may be getting recertified. If so, the question is whether it will be in time for the Dec 2025 tax credit deadline. The Fireview has a current letter of certification. Note that consumers also need to request the QM number from the dealer. Word is that without the QM number, no credit.
Yes they are still waiting on the certification from EPA before they can ship the PH. The stove was retested with a different crib wood method earlier this year and had to tweak the air control to let in more.
 
Woodstock said they are currently waiting for the EPA certification for the PH but that they are "hoping/expecting it very soon in the next week even" and then they will begin building the stoves. They also said they thought they could have it to me for installation before the deadline in December. I asked them to keep me informed about the certification progress and to let me know once they can be sure it will arrive in December or earlier.

I looked it up and unfortunately the language about biomass stoves from the IRS specifies that to claim the tax credit the stove must be "placed in service" by the deadline (https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/energy-efficient-home-improvement-credit) and the law terminating the tax credit specifies that it "shall not apply with respect to any property placed in service after December 31, 2025." https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/25C

Which unfortunately all seems pretty clear.

It's all a bit discouraging and I'm sure the shutdown will have an impact too, I read that some of the EPA will still be operational in the event of a shutdown but given the staffing cuts already causing delays I'm sure a shutdown will mean even more. The article here specifically discusses EPA staffing and the effects of a shutdown: https://www.eenews.net/articles/federal-workforce-girds-for-mass-firings-amid-shutdown-threat/

Good luck with getting yours before the deadline as well, fingers crossed.
 
There already have been mass layoffs at the EPA. That isn't helping certification processing.
 
Reading a blog post on the Woodstock site — I think it was one of the ones where the owner is pretty mad about the crib wood thing —it does seem they have basically real time phone contact with EPA. That’s a lot better than an awful lot of our toss-it-into-black-box experience with bureaucracy. And it gives me hope (except for the government shutdown) that their assessment is reasonable. The shutdown, well, how much of the EPA will even exist in a few weeks? Anybody’s guess.
 
@garbo, does the current tax credit even apply to a new build rather than to a previously existing home? Whether you can get a stove installed prior to the deadline may be an unnecessary concern if it doesn't apply to new construction.

I think you can expect a good amount of heat to move upstairs if the stove is located in the great room. I'm having a little trouble understanding the plans with my aging eyes. Is there a stove on the outside wall of the great room across from the stairwell? A fireplace next to the stairwell?

We have a stove located next to our stairwell at the corner of our open kitchen/living/dining room. It heats the main areas downstairs nicely, and heat does move upstairs. We do use our HVAC fan to circulate air from time to time since all our ducting is in conditioned space, but the warm air definitely does rise up our staircase to the upper floor. We do encourage kids to keep their doors open as they can to allow better air circulation.
 
@ DuaeGuttae The stove will be along the wall next to the stairs, right before the nook pictured on the plan, thanks for taking a look! There will be an HVAC to circulate air so thats a good point too, that will move air more than I was initially thinking.

I wasn't aware the credit was only for improvements to existing homes, which is embarrassing, but thank you for pointing that out. For other people waiting for the EPA approvals I'm still crossing my fingers for you :) and for the EPA to continue to exist in general
 
Stopped by Woodstock stoves while running errands. Not surprisingly, they did not get the approval before the EPA got shut down. She said not to worry, no sweat. I went out back and saw a line of Progress stoves she said they are starting ro put together. This was the same sales woman I ordered it from the other week, working on a sale to a couple today ( I tagged along to go into the back.)

Weirdly, in explaining cats to this couple who didn’t seem very stove savvy, she said something like, “It’s just something we have to add for the EPA.” Which makes me question her assurance that the min output would be about the same between the progress and fireview.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Todd
At Woodstock, I found myself slowly coming around to the look of the Absolute Steel. Moved from total aversion to “oh, that’s interesting” on those stoves. Those stoves are probably a better fit for our house except aesthetically, and cheaper. A bigger range, a lower end, and probably a quicker warm-up.

After a couple more errands it was only a couple miles out of the way to go to another stove store. That one was full of black rectangles. Lopi, Pacific Energy, Regency. The saleswoman in that store was even less up on how cats work. I was trying to get to the concept of range with her, but she would only talk bigger or smaller stove. I said it is possible to have a stove with a pretty high heat output that could also cruise along shut down, eating smoke, with the cat engaged. She said, no, you’ll get creosote in your chimney. I suggested they should burn clean. She said “Nope, you can’t burn a big stove except really hot or you’ll get creosote.”

Some of the stoves in there in fact had a cat right at the stovepipe exit. In that case, yes, just tacked on for the EPA and of little virtue, heat-wise. Either Pacific Energy or Regency — those all looked about the same to me. I guess of all the stoves in there I’d pick the little Lopi, but I would go with a Woodstock Absolute Steel, no matter how designed-on-acid, over any of those black boxes in that store.

After yet another errand, there is another stove store, right along my route home, not out of the way at all. I stopped there too. Pretty stoves were VC in there. I told the guy, “Vermont Castings have a reputation…” and he cut me off, “I know their reputation. I used to work for them!” I think we were on the same page? I then told him I had an Intrepid around the turn of the century, hands down the worst stove I ever had. No VC. They had Morso stoves, appealing but not EPA/tax credit approved. Jotuls where two out of the line were approved. They also had Hearthstone iron stoves, no stone, not that I would get a stone Hearthstone, even though the prospect of one of those set me off on this whole journey. Of the stoves in that store I’d pick their Jotul Oslo, but it’s over $6k. Tariffs. But -30%. Still I’d take any Woodstock stove over the Oslo. I’ve read somewhere that the Oslo can be hard to control. The cat can’t be bypassed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Todd
Sorry it has been such a challenge. Some stove shops have well informed personnel and others are not much better than going to a Best Buy.
 
More like a journey than a challenge! I'm very grateful for this forum. I've been reading lots of threads and learning a lot about stoves. Wood burning for me has been a really long journey, going back to 1979 when I got a gig house-sitting for free rent in a cabin with no running water and no heat but a leaky huge antique stove, in which I burned green wood I stacked right when I got the gig, in November. (The occupant of the cabin told me to go down to the local general store and fill up the glass jug by the stove with kerosene, and use that to start fires. I did that at that point, but never again. It's a wonder I survived.)
Then in various leaky rentals and farmhouses in VT and NH with various iron stoves and then building a soapstone masonry stove I used for over a decade. And onward through a few more stoves after that. Been pretty complacent in recent years and I guess in a rut with the Jotul F 3CB here and not paying much attention to stove designs pushing forward past this much -- and not much reason to push my own knowledge forward. But looking back, there is room for improvement over this old jotul. So I'm excited more than frustrated.

I guess the biggest challenge is the lack of EPA certification on the Progress, which I will blame on Elon Musk's Doge boys etc. EPA is gutted, limping at best, and now closed for the time being with the shutdown. I guess if I could have just got in line for a Progress and that's that, done deal, it's shipping, I would have stopped looking and thinking about stoves. I am not fully confident that that certification will go through this fall, and therefore am still looking around a bit.

But worst comes to worst, the Jotul is OK and I've got a shed with enough dry wood for a winter.
 
Stopped by Woodstock stoves while running errands. Not surprisingly, they did not get the approval before the EPA got shut down. She said not to worry, no sweat. I went out back and saw a line of Progress stoves she said they are starting ro put together. This was the same sales woman I ordered it from the other week, working on a sale to a couple today ( I tagged along to go into the back.)

Weirdly, in explaining cats to this couple who didn’t seem very stove savvy, she said something like, “It’s just something we have to add for the EPA.” Which makes me question her assurance that the min output would be about the same between the progress and fireview.
According to the EPA cordwood tests the Fireview low end output is about 8,000 BTU and I think the PH is around 13,000 BTU but that’s with a full load so overall the PH holds more BTU. Then again you don’t have to fill the firebox full and that would reduce BTU’s.
 
Yes, that was around the discussion when I asked about whether the progress might be too big. She said (after we had been talking a bunch), “It sounds like you know how to burn wood.” — so yeah, smaller fire on a not-as-cold day.

Was talking about stoves with a friend today and talking about my Jotul, and really only in that conversation remembering the difficulty of very-cold-weather small Jotul burning. Hard to control, fills with coals, hard to even fit wood in if the coals are piled up after a day of it, or running away and hard to control if I do manage to fit more than a bit of wood into it. Can’t wait to have something better!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Todd