Sounds like a stove pipe damper is called for to cover those conditions.Tall chimney, dry wood, well below zero F, and I worry that it will take off and get damaged.
Sounds like a stove pipe damper is called for to cover those conditions.Tall chimney, dry wood, well below zero F, and I worry that it will take off and get damaged.
That is just the tested output with a fixed weight of wood for testing purposes. It does not reflect normal usage with full loads of cordwood.OK, it’s officially on the EPA site as of this afternoon. Progress Hybrid is a crib-wood tested certified stove. They’ve significantly narrowed the BTU output range: 15257-35222 btu/hour. I’m sure Woodstock isn’t happy about that change. Both ends of it make me nervous, theoretically worse than my Jotul 3CB on either end. Just looking at the ranges on the EPA site it makes the Fireview seem to be a far superior stove, or more flexible anyway. In practice, I’m sure the PH will put out more heat than my little Jotul, and I’m assuming that with some attention to fuel load size I can manage some lower end heat as well. I’m assuming it can crank out far more heat than the Fireview, in spite of the 35,222 number on the EPA site (vs the FireView’s EPA 56,499 btu/hr top end). Anyway, I assume they’ll start shipping them and I’ll get mine soon-ish.
Good news. The PH is just a 2.8 cf stove and Woodstock has been known to exaggerate their volume measurements. Sort the epa list by firebox volume and you’ll see that the PH is not very large, and being stone it’s not something I’d worry about being too much stove. Enjoy it!OK, it’s officially on the EPA site as of this afternoon. Progress Hybrid is a crib-wood tested certified stove. They’ve significantly narrowed the BTU output range: 15257-35222 btu/hour. I’m sure Woodstock isn’t happy about that change. Both ends of it make me nervous, theoretically worse than my Jotul 3CB on either end. Just looking at the ranges on the EPA site it makes the Fireview seem to be a far superior stove, or more flexible anyway. In practice, I’m sure the PH will put out more heat than my little Jotul, and I’m assuming that with some attention to fuel load size I can manage some lower end heat as well. I’m assuming it can crank out far more heat than the Fireview, in spite of the 35,222 number on the EPA site (vs the FireView’s EPA 56,499 btu/hr top end). Anyway, I assume they’ll start shipping them and I’ll get mine soon-ish.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.