My approach is the same as yours.
I also use my own common sense in assuming risks. "Red tape" government regulations are there for people who lack common sense. I have a 6 foot ladder with a warning on it not to stand on it any higher than 3 feet 11 inches. That warning is there for the people who lack the common sense to know whether or not it's safe to climb a ladder at all. I'm an electrical contractor who lives on ladders for 40 years now. So I use my own common sense to determine what's safe and what isn't. I keep the warning label on the ladder as a joke.
Have you noticed new electronic safety features on vehicles? There's automatic braking if you get too close to the vehicle in front of you. There are back up proximity warnings and cameras. And now there's even a device that warns you when you drift out of your lane while you're yakking on your smartphone or texting.

These features have evolved in order to compensate for unaware distracted self absorbed people with poor driving skills. The more of them there are, the worse drivers can be and yet still operate a vehicle.
Wood stoves are just like any other product which involves chosen assumed risk by the owner. European Morso Squirrels have upper and lower air controls while the Squirrels imported into the US are the dumbed down government regulated version with one air control.
Morso mercifully put just one tiny tack weld on the lower control to immobilize it. In my opinion they did that to make it easy to make operable by owners who are willing to assime the risk of operating a stove with two air controls.. They could just as easily welded it all the way around to make it irreversable.
This thread has been interesting beyond the topic, in that it has revealed two different approaches to life. One approach depends on bureaucracies, regulations, mandates, warnings, restrictions, liabilities, penalties and indemnifications as compensations for people who lack common sense. While the other approach uses common sense itself.