Hello everyone my family is in the process of building a new home and we have been trying to figure out the fireplace and thought we had it figured out, but things have been brought back into question so I thought I'd post here and see if anyone has suggestions or advice for us.
Here is some background: Initially, we had planned on having the builder put in a full masonry fireplace for us and then we were going to add in a insert in the future. We would likely not really use the fireplace much/at all until that point because in my experience fires without a insert are a bit harder to manage and can really consume wood. Our builder has come back to us with the suggestion of just starting the the insert and not doing a full masonry fireplace because for the price of doing a full masonry fireplace we could probably just install the insert to begin with.
Is there a point to having a full masonry fireplace if a insert is going to be installed? My understanding is that no matter your situation with a insert a stainless steel pipe is going to be installed in the chimney to channel the smoke up the chimney. With full masonry the chimney would lined - is this only for wood burning fireplaces with no insert?
I was originally trying to avoid doing a engineered fireplace because I read online that they have a lifetime (relatively short by home standards) and then are a pain to rip out and replace because everything is manufactured on a per-product basis.
The builder was suggesting putting in something like the Regency R90/EX90 or something by Superior like the WRT3920. However i'm having trouble determining if these are considered engineered fireplaces or something different.
Hopefully this wasn't too stream of consciousness to follow. I think it boils down to whether or not there is a advantage to doing a full masonry fireplace and then installing a insert or if we may as well just go with the insert to begin with.
Thanks!
Here is some background: Initially, we had planned on having the builder put in a full masonry fireplace for us and then we were going to add in a insert in the future. We would likely not really use the fireplace much/at all until that point because in my experience fires without a insert are a bit harder to manage and can really consume wood. Our builder has come back to us with the suggestion of just starting the the insert and not doing a full masonry fireplace because for the price of doing a full masonry fireplace we could probably just install the insert to begin with.
Is there a point to having a full masonry fireplace if a insert is going to be installed? My understanding is that no matter your situation with a insert a stainless steel pipe is going to be installed in the chimney to channel the smoke up the chimney. With full masonry the chimney would lined - is this only for wood burning fireplaces with no insert?
I was originally trying to avoid doing a engineered fireplace because I read online that they have a lifetime (relatively short by home standards) and then are a pain to rip out and replace because everything is manufactured on a per-product basis.
The builder was suggesting putting in something like the Regency R90/EX90 or something by Superior like the WRT3920. However i'm having trouble determining if these are considered engineered fireplaces or something different.
Hopefully this wasn't too stream of consciousness to follow. I think it boils down to whether or not there is a advantage to doing a full masonry fireplace and then installing a insert or if we may as well just go with the insert to begin with.
Thanks!