Unless extended, the 30% federal rebate is over at the end of 2019. The equipment has to be in service (which includes utility approval. There is still a credit in later years it just phases out. 26% in 2020, 22% in 2021 and then 10% thereon.
The clock is ticking on 30% federal solar credit
- Thread starter peakbagger
- Start date
-
Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.
We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.
We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
Woodsplitter67
Minister of Fire
The chinese are claiming that the price of solar panels are not going to be dropping anymore and may increase in price as the excess manufacturing capacity has been taken care of. If the prices had kept dropping at the same rate, the reduced federal rebate next year would have been offset by the reduced cost of panels.
Or we could continue to develop alternatives that will diversify our energy sources leading to less chance of interrupted service.
Ha ha, yeah. Pretty funny.
As long as you don't want to force everyone else to pay more for expensive fossil fuel electricity and outdated utility generation, transmission and distribution systems that fatten investor pockets but only deliver 1/3 of the BTUs the consume as fuel, I'm ok with whatever you personally want to spend your money on.
SpaceBus
Minister of Fire
I am hoping to do solar at some point. I don't know when as we have many pressing house repairs. Can someone post a link to more details about the solar credit?
The federal tax credit is important but far more important is how the utility treats grid tied solar. The governor and legislature of Maine up until recently has made solar unattractive in Maine. With the new governor and legislature things may change. Call your utility and find out how they deal with grid tied solar and how they pay for excess power generated that is sent to the grid. Generally net metering is the preferred method where excess power effectively "runs the meter backwards" with your excess generation and then when you need more power it just comes back through the meter. Some areas want to charge a fee for every KW your system sends to the gird and in some cases they even want a fee for every KW generated by your PV array even if you are using it.
The solar tax credit is pretty simple, after you have applied all other rebates you get a tax credit of 30% of the value of the installed cost of the solar system. Note this is a tax credit not a deduction so even if you dont itemize you still get the credit against taxes owed. The only issue is to keep in mind is that you can only get a credit against tax owed. Someone on fixed income with no taxes may not owe enough taxes to get their money back. The credit carries forward to later years but it needs to be taken into account. One important thing to keep in mind is that the credit applies to the total installed cost. This is one of these "see your tax advisor" situations but many folks are claiming the credit for the cost of having to replace the underlying roof if its too old and others have claimed the replacement of main panel as it does not have enough capacity. Note if someone elects to go overboard like claiming the entire cost of the roof where only one part is covered with panels its pushing it. Reportedly the IRS rarely audits these credits but its up to what you or your tax advisor is willing to support. Others have done pole mounts and included the cost to run the trench and conduit in the cost to install the system. They just a happened to drop a few spare conduits for other reasons.
The solar tax credit is pretty simple, after you have applied all other rebates you get a tax credit of 30% of the value of the installed cost of the solar system. Note this is a tax credit not a deduction so even if you dont itemize you still get the credit against taxes owed. The only issue is to keep in mind is that you can only get a credit against tax owed. Someone on fixed income with no taxes may not owe enough taxes to get their money back. The credit carries forward to later years but it needs to be taken into account. One important thing to keep in mind is that the credit applies to the total installed cost. This is one of these "see your tax advisor" situations but many folks are claiming the credit for the cost of having to replace the underlying roof if its too old and others have claimed the replacement of main panel as it does not have enough capacity. Note if someone elects to go overboard like claiming the entire cost of the roof where only one part is covered with panels its pushing it. Reportedly the IRS rarely audits these credits but its up to what you or your tax advisor is willing to support. Others have done pole mounts and included the cost to run the trench and conduit in the cost to install the system. They just a happened to drop a few spare conduits for other reasons.
SpaceBus
Minister of Fire
I have read a little bit, probably here, about the issues with grid tied solar in Maine. I doubt the tax credit would benefit me at all due to my fixed income, as you mentioned. I highly doubt I have it in me to work enough to make the tax credit worth it. On the other hand I have cashed out some investments, federal tax withheld, this year and maybe it is worth it. I'll have to talk to the local tax prep office soon anyway.
Check this site for info on Maine options.
https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/solar-rebates-incentives/me/
I take it you have microinverters or optimizers?. Adding panels to string inverters is now a major PITA due to the rapid shutdown requirements and basically will be close to impossible if they go to the proposed standard of shutoff effectively at each panel barring someone coming up with an affordable remote cut off option at the panel level which is one step away from an optimizer.
![[Hearth.com] The clock is ticking on 30% federal solar credit](https://www.hearth.com/talk/data/attachments/240/240305-8761d19aeded37e6abbb4e9c7f686f88.jpg?hash=BrXy5frmIB "[Hearth.com] The clock is ticking on 30% federal solar credit")
My 20 panel ground mount system is going in right now as I type this. In Arkansas I’m grandfathered in at 20 years with 1 to 1 net metering. The utilities are trying to change the agreement with new legislation, but I’m getting in under the old system. Note you must have a tax liability to get the credit, but thought after 2021 it’s no longer available even at 10%?
Last edited by a moderator:
CaptSpiff
Minister of Fire
What does "I’m grandfathered in at 20 years" mean?
Do you have a legally binding contract?
Or are you relying on a legislative stimulus program which can be revoked or changed by a new legislative agenda?
Besides that question, bully on you for going solar! I want to get an array up as well. But I believe the present "net metering" stimulus is on short life. Just make sure the array size makes sense for you (ie don't over build). I think the future of Electric Utility billing will break out many components and with Time Of Use Smart Meters coming every where, your solar array will be just another Power Producer paid at market rates. And that will be fair for everyone.
What I meant is that the rate I sell 1 kw to the utility, they sell it back to me at the same rate. I looked up the governing agency wording here in Arkansas and it states that the agreement at the time of install remains in effect for 20 years from my install. A state commission set this standard some years back, but my understanding is that the commission is under pressure to change the net metering agreement at the request of the utility companies operating in Arkansas. I understand that everything is fluid and can change quickly with new legislation. I’ll have to revisit the agreement to see how binding it is or if they’ve written an “out” for future changes in the legislation.
Would love for battery capacity and cost to be more consumer favorable in the future and be able to disconnect from a utility’s dependence. Maybe in 15 or 20 years from now things will look different.
Anyone know if these requirements only apply to roof-mounted panels? My understanding is that this requirement stems from safety concerns for fire fighters. It would seem that ground-mounted panels would negate this concern?
Mine will have an auto disconnect if the power is lost from the utility. I’m doing a ground mount system.
I have lost my best authority on the subject, Home Power Code Corner, but believe that RSD only applies to building mounted systems which seem to be the most prevalent systems installed. It does make sense as rarely does a PV system burn in an of itself so its unlikely that a firefighter or other worker could come into contact with live wires while the system is generating. The biggest potential is a fireman on a roof during fire operations but its also possible that the cabling insulation could be physically damaged by things like abrasion, rodents, or damage inflicted by operations on the roof (like a chimney sweep or roofer walking on cables). Ground mount systems rarely burn in and of themselves and all cabling and components are supposed to be protected from access by casual contact.and require a "tool" to access them. Some local AHJs require fencing around the array and others think its required by NEC. My pole mount wiring is protected by galvanized hardware cloth within reach of the ground. In either case it is the intent that casual contact by untrained people is prevented so no rapid shutdown is required.
Ground mount systems do have their particular issues, I have seen several auctions of fire damaged solar panels from grass fires running under the panels. The backs of the panels are sooty and in some cases the cabling is damaged. I think its probably a bigger issue with large solar fields. They are practically giving away the panels as in many areas getting rid of large amounts of panels cost money as they are treated as special wastes.ground mounts also seem to be more impacted by objects thrown by lawnmowers.
I have seen various claims that some firefighters will stand back and "let it burn" if there are roof mounted panels due to potential for electrocution. When I installed my original array, I found a good on line training course for firefighters having to deal with solar systems and sent it to the local fire chief to use in their monthly training.
Just curious but with .09 kwh electricty cost in Arkansas your payback must be like 15+ years? Arkansas is ranked 3rd for the cheapest power in the US.
Here in New England the payback is usually 5-7 years with some of the most expensive electricity in the lower 48. Most of us are paying .21+ a kwh. Here in CT we pay the same as Alaska! Though we do have the some of best solar incentives.
This is a great site to compare incentives and payback time.
https://www.solarpowerrocks.com/state-solar-power-rankings/
EIA electricity prices.
https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a
![[Hearth.com] The clock is ticking on 30% federal solar credit](https://www.hearth.com/talk/data/attachments/240/240363-a3cfa09755613b0fabb97496dba80bba.jpg?hash=8uRWZX_lRj "[Hearth.com] The clock is ticking on 30% federal solar credit")
![[Hearth.com] The clock is ticking on 30% federal solar credit](https://www.hearth.com/talk/data/attachments/240/240364-6531504d32cee2291b71fe1a4a965192.jpg?hash=ZNjGmQTbrO "[Hearth.com] The clock is ticking on 30% federal solar credit")
Yes, in fact 15 years is exactly the ROI on my system. I’m hoping it still operates a few years after that date!
Hey. We’re up 2 spots though.
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder why Arkansas is a D rating in price if it’s cheaper than MA, which is an A?
Where2
Feeling the Heat
I'll be doing the same, this year. It took me 2 years of income to recover the last federal incentives back in 2013... FL has no state incentives, despite being nicknamed the "Sunshine State". The power companies tried (unsuccessfully) to make it more difficult to install solar in one of the last election cycles. They literally don't want competition for their own growing collection of 550 acre PV array farms...
Similar threads
