What can I say...

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.

stoveliker

Minister of Fire
Hearth Supporter
Nov 17, 2019
11,506
Long Island NY
Found this elsewhere


AI slop, or a really, really stupid person - the latter would not be surprising given his CO breathing (if he humidifies his home by burning wet wood)...
 
LOL, heaven help us. Evidently their stove vents directly into the room. The whole site is an AI dumping ground. And the northern life... it's allegedly out of Dallas, Texas (or Nigeria?).
 
Just plain dangerous crap. This one is may be flawed enough to be easy for most to see how far off it is. I’m no Luddite but AI, along with the potential, is going to bring much disruption and much more believable misinformation.
 

Dangerous information from AI is not limited to online searches. Children’s toys that utilize AI have been found to able to give dangerous and uncensored information to children including how to light matches and a very wide range sexual practices. The toys also responded to some questions with Chinese propaganda.
 
AI hallucinations, aka lies, are already having disturbing consequences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Burnin Since 1991
I'm not sure AI is worth all the problems that go along with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dieselhead
I'm not opposed to AI development, just the rush to innundate the country with it for profit without due consideration to its risks and requirements. I am opposed to the aggressive push for governance soley at the federal level and taking away state's rights to protect their populace from negative consequences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stoveliker
There's AI written papers, there's AI hallucinations in citations to nonexisting papers, there's AI written peer review reports.
And then publishers are going to use AI systems to try to filter out AI content.
It's a digital weapons race that goes much faster than the good old (poorly written) fishing/spam stuff.
And it's costing a lot of $$ for those who wish to filter out such stuff (as scientific publishers).