After previously burning non-EPA for 3 years(almost a lifetime huh 
) then going to EPA for 4 months this winter I would say the only heating scenario that I would ever use a non-EPA stove would be a camp for weekends so I could get quick heat and I wasn't so worried about wood consumption.  Max instantaneous heat output of non-EPA stoves are higher and throw more heat for +/- 1 hour of the burn cycle(EPA burns tend to be 3-4 hrs longer).  This is the ONLY benefit I see with a non-EPA.  Other than that your wasting wood, heat, and convenience.  Just my inexperienced opinion.
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			
) then going to EPA for 4 months this winter I would say the only heating scenario that I would ever use a non-EPA stove would be a camp for weekends so I could get quick heat and I wasn't so worried about wood consumption.  Max instantaneous heat output of non-EPA stoves are higher and throw more heat for +/- 1 hour of the burn cycle(EPA burns tend to be 3-4 hrs longer).  This is the ONLY benefit I see with a non-EPA.  Other than that your wasting wood, heat, and convenience.  Just my inexperienced opinion.