After previously burning non-EPA for 3 years(almost a lifetime huh
) then going to EPA for 4 months this winter I would say the only heating scenario that I would ever use a non-EPA stove would be a camp for weekends so I could get quick heat and I wasn't so worried about wood consumption. Max instantaneous heat output of non-EPA stoves are higher and throw more heat for +/- 1 hour of the burn cycle(EPA burns tend to be 3-4 hrs longer). This is the ONLY benefit I see with a non-EPA. Other than that your wasting wood, heat, and convenience. Just my inexperienced opinion.
) then going to EPA for 4 months this winter I would say the only heating scenario that I would ever use a non-EPA stove would be a camp for weekends so I could get quick heat and I wasn't so worried about wood consumption. Max instantaneous heat output of non-EPA stoves are higher and throw more heat for +/- 1 hour of the burn cycle(EPA burns tend to be 3-4 hrs longer). This is the ONLY benefit I see with a non-EPA. Other than that your wasting wood, heat, and convenience. Just my inexperienced opinion.