I live in a 1920's house, two stories and a walkout basement. We love our fireplace but we have to either get a wood stove insert or a gas fireplace because the flu has to be fixed, and the diameter of the chimney will be too small for us to be able to make fires that are not all smoke after the flu liner is added (that is my understanding). The liner is now clay. I don't think we would seriously consider gas.
I have been reading threads on this forum as well as visiting showrooms, and I am pretty confused as to what we should do. We have gas heat with radiators which is our primary heat source. The fireplace is at the foot of the steps, in the front corner of the living room, and our 2nd floor is already significantly warmer (at least 5 degrees) all winter long. It is warm enough upstairs that I do not generally need to turn on the heat during the day if I stay upstairs.
From reading, it seems that the newest wood stoves require very dry wood because of improved efficiency. I have two primary interests.
1. Ease/simplicity of use, including (if possible) less finicky about using super, super dry wood
2. Ability to moderate temperature
I am leaning towards a stove with catalytic converter because of ability to easily moderate temperature and I do like the lower emissions. Are stoves with cats more finicky about wood as the tradeoff?
I live in a pretty urban area (Southeast PA) so not much space for wood storage. I can't imagine that this would ever be a primary heat source for us unless we have a power outage (a bit too frequent these days).
I think that for our purposes, the brand may not be the most important thing, and that's where I start getting super confused because each brand seems to have its proponents.
Any help with the technology that we should be looking for? Features? Materials?
Appreciate any help!
Cheers,
LBC
I have been reading threads on this forum as well as visiting showrooms, and I am pretty confused as to what we should do. We have gas heat with radiators which is our primary heat source. The fireplace is at the foot of the steps, in the front corner of the living room, and our 2nd floor is already significantly warmer (at least 5 degrees) all winter long. It is warm enough upstairs that I do not generally need to turn on the heat during the day if I stay upstairs.
From reading, it seems that the newest wood stoves require very dry wood because of improved efficiency. I have two primary interests.
1. Ease/simplicity of use, including (if possible) less finicky about using super, super dry wood
2. Ability to moderate temperature
I am leaning towards a stove with catalytic converter because of ability to easily moderate temperature and I do like the lower emissions. Are stoves with cats more finicky about wood as the tradeoff?
I live in a pretty urban area (Southeast PA) so not much space for wood storage. I can't imagine that this would ever be a primary heat source for us unless we have a power outage (a bit too frequent these days).
I think that for our purposes, the brand may not be the most important thing, and that's where I start getting super confused because each brand seems to have its proponents.
Any help with the technology that we should be looking for? Features? Materials?
Appreciate any help!
Cheers,
LBC