that 2 year seasoned wood burns so much better than 1 year wood? I am curious.
We had a bit over a cord of 2 year wood that I got into this winter and I was shocked at the difference between burning that and the one year stuff, but what I can't figure out is why. Both 1 & 2 year are hard (sugar) maple splits averaging 3"-5" at the thickest part and what is fascinating is that a moisture meter sampling of half dozen pieces from each year show them all within a range of 12%-13% regardless when they were cut/processed. (Readings were all taken at the same time, from fresh split pieces from each year).
Any thoughts?
We had a bit over a cord of 2 year wood that I got into this winter and I was shocked at the difference between burning that and the one year stuff, but what I can't figure out is why. Both 1 & 2 year are hard (sugar) maple splits averaging 3"-5" at the thickest part and what is fascinating is that a moisture meter sampling of half dozen pieces from each year show them all within a range of 12%-13% regardless when they were cut/processed. (Readings were all taken at the same time, from fresh split pieces from each year).
Any thoughts?