Tons of new owners, lots of experienced ones. E-Raise your e-hand if you think you might mess with the inlet for the secondaries? Discuss...
BrotherBart said:Never heard of anybody modifying the secondary air system on a 30.
fossil said:Oh yeah, I got that same setup on my Liberty, pen. Sweet! :lol:
Stump_Branch said:Me think pen had a thread once on blocking the secondary air AFTER the load has finished outgassing or burned to coals, doing so extended the "burn time"...pen?
I was thinking about being able to close off or adjust maybe the amount of air into the tube. I thought it was Pen that did that already, but I guess I was wrong. Don't have a link right now and too lazy to look. Besides NOS I'm open to any other cool mods.Jags said:BrotherBart said:Never heard of anybody modifying the secondary air system on a 30.
Danno - for the sake of clarity, you may want to be real, real specific about "whut you talkin' 'bout Willis?".
And don't forget the flames shooting out the chimney. Cooked an entire gaggle as it flew over in V formation.BrotherBart said:I tried that nitrous setup but the neighbors kept bitching about chimney caps falling on their houses.
Danno77 said:I was thinking about being able to close off or adjust maybe the amount of air into the tube. I think it was Pen that did that already. Don't have a link right now and too lazy to look. Besides NOS I'm open to any other cool mods.
pen said:Been a while since I've needed to whip this out but I'll show it off :coolsmirk:
pen
Main reason is that I like to be in control. It's like modifying my car so that I can have the defroster setting on without having the AC compressor running.Jags said:Danno77 said:I was thinking about being able to close off or adjust maybe the amount of air into the tube. I think it was Pen that did that already. Don't have a link right now and too lazy to look. Besides NOS I'm open to any other cool mods.
Welp, here is my take: It has been posted that a piece of foil over the secondary inlet can assist in shutting down a runaway 30, but beyond that, I don't see why anybody would want to modify that intake. It is a highly integral part of the clean burn operation of the stove. You would have to convince me (beyond the runaway scenario) that ANY modification to this intake would have ANY positive effect and "how". Prepare for a rebuttal.
Danno77 said:Main reason is that I like to be in control. It's like modifying my car so that I can have the defroster setting on without having the AC compressor running.
GAMMA RAY said:pen said:Been a while since I've needed to whip this out but I'll show it off :coolsmirk:
pen
Hmmmm??? :lol:
That shirt you sent me pen...
I am not wearing that "I love Magic Heat" t-shirt to the Hearth shindig....
I don't care if you are wearing yours or not pen....besides it's pink and I do not wear that color....
No no no... >:-(
Jags said:Danno77 said:Main reason is that I like to be in control. It's like modifying my car so that I can have the defroster setting on without having the AC compressor running.
I am not trying to sound like a butt head here, but the better analogy would be: So I could kill the spark to two cylinders while pumping that unburnt fuel out the tail pipe.
Hmmm...73 super beetle with tailgators...My 73 Challenger doesn't seem to have that problem. :lol: ;-)Delta-T said:..worked perfectly on my '73 Super Beetle.