52 cords of Oak has the same BTU content as one pound of enriched Uranium. I could heat my house for over 20 years on one pound. but the stove to burn it in would take up more room than the 52 cords of oak.
I'll stick with the red oak. I'm messed up in the head plenty enough as it is, that uranium laying in my backyard would have me totally LOOPY.....52 cords of Oak has the same BTU content as one pound of enriched Uranium. I could heat my house for over 20 years on one pound. but the stove to burn it in would take up more room than the 52 cords of oak.
Can you retrofit a radiation shield on the 30 ? Wow it would be one radiant stove.
Scotty the Overkiller
Maybe just use lead based paint.Can you retrofit a radiation shield on the 30 ? Wow it would be one radiant stove.
Hey...stop talking about Plutonium and Uranium...we're all going to end up on some government watch list...some of us on ANOTHER government watch list.
As a Senior Reactor Operator at the local nuke plant, I thought I would throw this little fun fact out there:
According to the Nuclear Energy Institute, "A single uranium fuel pellet the size of a fingertip contains as much energy as 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas, 1,780 pounds of coal or 149 gallons of oil." This pellet will only weigh approximately 7 grams.
Dealing with ash is bad enough...don't need to deal with nuclear waste!
Ummm. You westerners might not know that the ash from east coast oak IS nuclear waste. Seriously...
(broken link removed to http://breathehealthyair.blogspot.com/2007/09/wood-ash-unregulated-radwaste.html)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.